ArticleMolecular biology reports2026
Forensic evaluation of the reliability and validity of XIST and RPS4Y1 RNA biomarkers as sex discriminators for touch samples.
Article in Molecular biology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe forensic determination of biological sex from trace evidence remains challenging because of nucleic acid degradation in touch samples. Recent advances suggest that RNA, particularly sex-specific markers such as X inactive specific transcript (XIST) and ribosomal protein S4 Y-linked 1 (RPS4Y1), may serve as more reliable alternatives. METHODS AND
resultsThis study aimed to assess the reliability and temporal stability of these markers across different surfaces and time intervals. Touch samples from male and female donors were deposited on glass and leather, then analyzed immediately, after 14 days, and after 28 days. Quantitative real-time PCR was used to measure XIST (female-specific) and RPS4Y1 (male-specific), normalized to GAPDH. The results demonstrated consistent sex-specific expression, with XIST robustly expressed in female samples and RPS4Y1 strongly expressed in male samples, while absent in females. Both markers were detectable up to 28 days, although surface-dependent differences were noted. Leather preserved RNA better than glass, with RPS4Y1 showing greater degradation on glass, whereas XIST remained stable on leather. Significant temporal and surface effects were observed (p < 0.0001), yet both genes retained discriminatory power over time.
conclusionsThese findings validate XIST and RPS4Y1 as reliable RNA biomarkers for sex determination in forensic touch samples. Their specificity and durability, particularly on leather surfaces, highlight their potential integration into routine forensic workflows, providing investigators with a robust method for determining the biological sex of individuals from minimal and degraded biological material.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42371253What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.