Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42371210›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2026

Microbial bioindicators for multidimensional assessment of environmental alterations and ecosystem functioning.

Trisnehi Pradhan, Krishna Palit, Sharmily Chakraborty, Sonalin Rath, Hirak Ranjan Dash, Surajit Das

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Trisnehi Pradhan *Laboratory of Environmental Microbiology and Ecology (LEnME), Department of Life Science, National Institute of Technology, Rourkela, 769008, Odisha, India.
Krishna Palit *Laboratory of Environmental Microbiology and Ecology (LEnME), Department of Life Science, National Institute of Technology, Rourkela, 769008, Odisha, India.
Sharmily ChakrabortyLaboratory of Environmental Microbiology and Ecology (LEnME), Department of Life Science, National Institute of Technology, Rourkela, 769008, Odisha, India.
Sonalin RathLaboratory of Environmental Microbiology and Ecology (LEnME), Department of Life Science, National Institute of Technology, Rourkela, 769008, Odisha, India.
Hirak Ranjan DashSchool of Forensic Sciences, Centurion University of Technology and Management, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, 752050, India.
Surajit DasLaboratory of Environmental Microbiology and Ecology (LEnME), Department of Life Science, National Institute of Technology, Rourkela, 769008, Odisha, India. surajit@nitrkl.ac.in.

Funding

Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, India 38/1517/21/EMR-II
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anthropogenic stressors leading to environmental pollution and subsequent climate change are emerging as a global concern. Consequently, the quality of the major environmental components, such as air, water, and soil is deteriorating, adversely affecting the overall ecosystem functioning. In this regard, bioindicators play a vital role in assessing environmental alterations and their implications for the functional integrity of ecosystems. Microbial bioindicators exhibit noticeable changes in physiological, behavioural and diversity patterns, in response to the changing environmental conditions. Among them, the microscopic indicators, including bacteria, fungi, protists, plankton and lichen show remarkable sensitivity towards environmental alterations due to their comparatively simple cellular processes. They respond to environmental disturbances in terms of distinctive characteristics, including bioluminescence, pathogenicity, pigmentation, altered diversity, photosynthetic responses and chemical degradation. Essentially, they serve as critical bioindicators of potentially polluted or unpolluted environments. Moreover, these microbial biomarkers not only signal environmental degradation but also provide early warning signals, further maintaining the ecosystem stability. Despite their reported application in environmental assessment, knowledge of microbial indicator mechanisms, ecological interactions, and emerging bioengineering approaches remains fragmented. Overall, microbial bioindicators serve as valuable monitoring tools, due to their ecological significance, indicator mechanisms, applications in biomonitoring, and recent advances in engineered biosensing approaches. Advances in molecular biology, microbial diversity assessment, and microbial bioengineering approaches exhibit significant potential for enhancing environmental biomonitoring.

Indexed as

Anthropogenic EffectsEcosystemEnvironmental MicrobiologyEnvironmental MonitoringEnvironmental BiomarkersEnvironmental BiomarkersBioindicatorBiomarkerBiomonitoringMicroorganismsPollution

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.