Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42371205›Full record

ReviewCancer metastasis reviews2026

Resolving translational challenges in cancer biology through yeast experimental evolution.

Li-Tzu Wang, Han-Ying Jhuang

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer metastasis reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Li-Tzu WangSchool of Medical Laboratory Science and Biotechnology, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Han-Ying JhuangSchool of Medical Laboratory Science and Biotechnology, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan. hanyingjhuang@tmu.edu.tw.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer genomics, molecular pathology, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy have transformed how tumors are diagnosed and treated, yet several problems remain hard to resolve prospectively, including the interpretation of variants of uncertain significance, variable penetrance, recurrent drug resistance, and the early trajectories that predispose later therapeutic failure. Many of these are fundamentally evolutionary questions about which adaptive routes are accessible under selection and how reproducibly they arise. Here, we make the case that yeast experimental evolution can serve cancer biologists as a practical upstream discovery platform, because its control, scale, and temporal resolution expose recurrent adaptive routes, transient intermediates, compensatory mechanisms, and genotype-to-fitness relationships that mammalian systems resolve only slowly. We organize representative studies by evolutionary dynamic, set out design principles and an operational workflow, and mark where these models are strong, where they mislead, and where fission yeast adds complementary strengths. Together, these elements frame yeast evolution as a way to prioritize and sharpen downstream validation in cancer systems.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeAnimalsBiological EvolutionEvolution, MolecularHumansSchizosaccharomycesTranslational Research, BiomedicalAneuploidyCancer evolutionExperimental evolutionPrecision oncologyReplication stressSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSchizosaccharomyces pombeTelomere maintenanceTherapy resistanceVariants of uncertain significance

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.