ReviewTechniques in coloproctology2026
When nothing else matters: proctectomy for complex perianal Crohn's disease-indications, timing, techniques, and outcomes.
Review in Techniques in coloproctology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Complex perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease may progress to a functionally end-stage anorectum characterized by refractory proctitis, fixed anorectal stenosis/stricture, cavitating or recurrent pelvic sepsis, and complex branching fistulas, where repeated local salvage offers diminishing returns. This narrative review synthesizes predominantly observational evidence and consensus guidance on indications, timing, operative strategy, and outcomes of definitive proctectomy/abdominoperineal resection (APR). Decision-making should be structured and time-bound: Define anatomy and occult sepsis with pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and examination under anesthesia (EUA), and perform EUA-guided biopsy when malignancy is suspected or surveillance is impractical. When reversibility is uncertain, planned temporary diversion can be used as a 3-6-month trial with explicit targets and stop rules; failure to meet milestones should prompt timely discussion of definitive resection. Operative choice (proctectomy/APR versus proctocolectomy) and dissection plane (close intersphincteric versus wider excision beyond the sphincter complex) should prioritize complete excision of chronically infected tissue and oncologic safety. Because perineal wound morbidity and persistent perineal sinus are common, outcomes depend on preoperative optimization, explicit dead-space/closure planning (primary closure, delayed management, omentoplasty, or flap reconstruction), and a postoperative pathway for early imaging and stepwise salvage. Appropriately timed surgery can provide durable control of sepsis and pain and reduce recurrent urgent interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.