Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42371180›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2026

Passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) to assess benthic communities associated with offshore wind farms: insights and future directions.

Laurence H De Clippele, Ross J Barnett, Marta Bolgan, Flora Kent, Kirsty Wright, Kate Brookes, Alexander Gilliland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Laurence H De ClippeleSchool of Biodiversity, One Health, and Veterinary Medicine, University of Glasgow, Graham Kerr Building, Science Way, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK. laurence.declippele@glasgow.ac.uk.
Ross J BarnettSchool of Biodiversity, One Health, and Veterinary Medicine, University of Glasgow, Graham Kerr Building, Science Way, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK.
Marta BolganFugro, 1-9 The Curve, 32 Research Avenue North, Heriot-Watt Research Park, Edinburgh, UK.
Flora KentScience, Evidence, Data and Digital, Marine Laboratory, Scottish Government, Marine Directorate, Aberdeen, UK.
Kirsty WrightScience, Evidence, Data and Digital, Marine Laboratory, Scottish Government, Marine Directorate, Aberdeen, UK.
Kate BrookesScience, Evidence, Data and Digital, Marine Laboratory, Scottish Government, Marine Directorate, Aberdeen, UK.
Alexander GillilandScottish Marine Energy Research (ScotMER) Programme Offshore Wind Directorate, Scottish Government, Aberdeen, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding biodiversity in offshore benthic ecosystems is crucial as anthropogenic pressures like offshore wind development increasingly alter marine environments. Passive acoustic monitoring (PAM), widely used for marine mammal research, offers a promising yet underexplored tool for assessing broader faunal communities. Here, we investigate whether PAM data, collected initially for marine mammal monitoring, can reveal spatial variation in benthic biodiversity along Scotland's east coast. We analysed passive acoustic data from eight offshore sedimentary habitats, identifying 16 distinct biological sound types likely produced by fish and invertebrates. Acoustic indices were also calculated and compared with environmental variables and infaunal benthic richness derived from open-source biodiversity databases. Our results show that key habitat variables, including substrate type, current velocity, and spawning suitability, drive variation in acoustic communities. The findings of this pilot study demonstrate that PAM can be used to detect biologically meaningful patterns in benthic assemblages, and with future work focusing on investigating longer-term datasets, it could offer a cost-effective tool for biodiversity monitoring across space and time. While several acoustic indices correlated with phonic richness and benthic diversity, we currently do not recommend their use in biodiversity monitoring. This study highlights the ecological value of existing acoustic datasets and advances our understanding of soundscape ecology and species-habitat relationships in changing marine environments.

Indexed as

AcousticsAquatic OrganismsEnvironmental MonitoringWindAnimalsBiodiversityEcosystemFishesInvertebratesScotlandAcoustic indicesBioacousticsBiodiversityFishInvertebratesPhonic richness

Identifiers

PMID42371180
PMCPMC13314827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.