Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42371169›Full record

ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2026

Evaluation of the concept of students learning practical gynecological and obstetric skills at a large German university hospital, using the example of the Homburg university women's clinic.

Sebastian Findeklee, Mariz Kasoha, Gregor Leonhard Olmes, Klaus Diedrich, Mihai-Teodor Georgescu, Romina Marina Sima, Erich-Franz Solomayer, Bashar Haj Hamoud

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sebastian FindekleeDepartment for Gynecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, Saarland University Hospital, Saarland University, Kirrberger Straße 100, Building 9, D-66421, Homburg, Germany. sebastian.findeklee@uks.eu.
Mariz KasohaDepartment for Gynecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, Saarland University Hospital, Saarland University, Kirrberger Straße 100, Building 9, D-66421, Homburg, Germany.
Gregor Leonhard OlmesDepartment for Gynecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, Saarland University Hospital, Saarland University, Kirrberger Straße 100, Building 9, D-66421, Homburg, Germany.
Klaus DiedrichCampus Lübeck, Frauenklinik, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Ratzeburger Allee 160, D-23562, Lübeck, Germany.
Mihai-Teodor GeorgescuDepartment for Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital "Carol Davila", RO-020021, Bucaresti, Romania.
Romina Marina SimaDepartment for Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital "Carol Davila", RO-020021, Bucaresti, Romania.
Erich-Franz SolomayerDepartment for Gynecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, Saarland University Hospital, Saarland University, Kirrberger Straße 100, Building 9, D-66421, Homburg, Germany.
Bashar Haj HamoudDepartment for Gynecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, Saarland University Hospital, Saarland University, Kirrberger Straße 100, Building 9, D-66421, Homburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe teaching and practical training of future doctors play an important role in the university curriculum. MATERIAL AND

methodsAt the Women's Clinic of Saarland University Hospital in Homburg, we developed a five-day block placement concept that focused on learning practical gynecological and obstetric skills rather than simply imparting theoretical knowledge. The student`s satisfaction with the block placement was assessed using a non-standardized questionnaire with the two items "How do you rate your learning outcomes from the placement?" and "The placement increased my interest in gynecology and obstetrics". The assessment was based on a scale of 1 to 6. OUTCOME: A total of 205 out of 220 students (93.2%) from the winter semester 2022/2023 participated in the evaluation and completed the questionnaire. 198 students (96.6%) rated the satisfaction with their perceived learning from the block internship as very good (1) or good (2), and 201 students (98%) reported an increase in their interest in the subject area. DISCUSSION: An overwhelming majority of students rated the practical teaching concept as very good or good, which speaks to the success of this practical teaching format. Nevertheless, the study also has several limitations. For example, only one cohort of medical students was surveyed. Furthermore, when establishing a new teaching concept, there is a risk that participants in an evaluation will not respond objectively, but rather according to the criterion of social desirability. We suggest our practice-oriented block placement concept, which focuses on learning skills relevant to the future medical profession, as a possible curriculum for undergraduate teaching in gynecology and obstetrics, to inspire students for the field.

Indexed as

Education, Medical, UndergraduateGynecologyObstetricsStudents, MedicalAdultClinical CompetenceCurriculumFemaleGermanyHospitals, UniversityHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultBlock internshipEvaluationGynecology and obstetricsStudent teaching

Identifiers

PMID42371169
PMCPMC13314887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.