Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42371160›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomolecular NMR2026

RelCalc: symbolic evaluation of BWR theory relaxation rates in python, applications to TROSY effects in AX[Formula: see text] spin systems.

James Eaton, Daniel Stedman, Andrew J Baldwin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomolecular NMR, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

James EatonPhysical and Theoretical Chemistry, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.
Daniel StedmanPhysical and Theoretical Chemistry, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.
Andrew J BaldwinPhysical and Theoretical Chemistry, Oxford University, Oxford, UK. andrew.baldwin@chem.ox.ac.uk.

Funding

European Research Council (grant agreement No 101002859)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Relaxation phenomena greatly influence magnetic resonance experiments, from setting repetition rates and measurement times through to measuring internal motion of molecules. RelCalc provides a convenient and efficient means for symbolic and numerical evaluation of relaxation rates using Bloch, Wagness and Redfield (BWR) theory. Users supply interactions within a spin system arranged appropriately in the molecular frame. The effects of optional fluctuations around a symmetry axis, and then under either isotropic or anisotropic global tumbling are then computed. Relaxation rates linking pairs of Liouvillian basis operators are then returned symbolically, formatted as a sum of weighted reduced spectra density functions. Parameters are then supplied to replace symbolic quantities for values for rapid computation of numerical rates. We demonstrate the utility of the software by exploring relaxation interference (TROSY) effects and 'long-lived states' in [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] systems, which, for n=1,2, and 3, describe NH, NH[Formula: see text] and CH[Formula: see text] groups in proteins, and small molecules with n=4,6,8,12 and 20 arranged as platonic solids. The implementation is highly efficient with 65,536 relaxation rates required to perform complete Liouvillian simulation of [Formula: see text] methyl groups rotating about a symmetric axis in the presence of adjacent static 'external' spins being symbolically calculated in a few seconds on a single processor on a 2021 laptop. From this result, a complete set of numerical rates are then computed in under one second. RelCalc is implemented in python and is freely available.

Indexed as

Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, BiomolecularSoftwareAlgorithmsProteinsProteinsBWR theoryLong-lived statesMethylTROSYNMRRedfield theoryRelaxation ratesTROSY

Identifiers

PMID42371160
PMCPMC13314894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.