SynthesisChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2026
Impact of blood product removal versus temporary cerebrospinal fluid diversion on permanent shunting rates in posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus of prematurity: a comparative meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveIntraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) is a major complication of extreme prematurity and a leading cause of posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus (PHH). Standard surgical treatment with temporary CSF diversion (TCD) for severe IVH often leads to permanent shunting and lifelong complications. This study compares blood product removal (BPR) and TCD only in reducing permanent cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunt dependence in preterm infants.
methodsA systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines to compare treatment outcomes (permanent CSF shunting, post-intervention CSF-related infections, secondary IVH, and mortality) in patients who underwent BPR versus TCD.
resultsSix studies involving 256 patients (128 patients in each treatment group) met inclusion criteria. Baseline demographics, including gestational age, birth weight, and IVH severity, were comparable between groups. BPR was associated with a lower risk of permanent shunting [RR: 0.67 (95% CI: 0.46-1.00) as compared to TCD (p = 0.047). The mean time to shunting was longer in the BPR group, but the difference was not statistically significant (79.6 vs 47.63 days; p = 0.267). TCD was associated with higher rates of CSF-related infections (26.54% vs 2.40%; p = 0.019) and mortality (19.27% vs 3.47%; p = 0.007).
conclusionBPR was associated with a lower risk of permanent shunting and lower rates of mortality and CSF-related infections compared to TCD. While BPR presents a promising alternative to conventional TCD approaches, further studies are needed to validate these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42371150What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.