ArticleWorld journal of urology2026
Diagnostic clues for low-pressure female bladder outflow obstruction overlooked by conventional urodynamics.
Article in World journal of urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeFemale bladder outflow obstruction is typically characterized by high-pressure, low-flow patterns. However, low-pressure, low-flow variants are frequently overlooked by conventional urodynamic studies. This study aims to identify clinical predictors of low-pressure bladder outflow obstruction in women categorized as non-obstructed by standard criteria.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed women with lower urinary tract symptoms who underwent videourodynamics between 2012 and 2020. Conventional obstruction was defined as maximal flow rate of less than 12 milliliters per second combined with a detrusor pressure at maximal flow of greater than 20 centimeters of water. Patients not meeting these parameters were evaluated for low-pressure obstruction, confirmed via fluoroscopic evidence during videourodynamics.
resultsAmong 419 women classified as non-obstructed by conventional urodynamics, 128 (30.5%) demonstrated low-pressure bladder outflow obstruction on videourodynamics. Multivariable logistic regression identified a history of anti-incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse surgery and an International Prostate Symptom Score voiding-to-storage subscore ratio greater than 1 as significant independent predictors. Conversely, age 70 years or older and a mean flow rate of 10 milliliters per second or greater served as independent negative predictors.
conclusionsApproximately 30% of women deemed non-obstructed by conventional urodynamics exhibit low-pressure bladder outflow obstruction. Clinicians should prioritize further evaluation with videourodynamics in patients with prior anti-incontinence surgery, a high International Prostate Symptom Score voiding-to-storage subscore ratio, younger age, or low mean flow rates to prevent misdiagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42371143What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.