ArticleExperimental brain research2026
Trajectory dynamics and endpoint accuracy in targeted ballistic contractions.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although effort alters the neural commands driving ballistic contractions, its impact on endpoint accuracy remains poorly understood. Here, we examined how effort-related changes in trajectory fluctuations and inconsistency (trajectory dynamics) and muscle activation affect the accuracy of ballistic goal-directed contractions. Eighteen healthy young adults (26.4 ± 6.4 years; 9 women) performed ballistic isometric index finger abductions for 40 trials at each of the seven randomly assigned force levels (2, 5, 15, 30, 50, 70, 85% of maximum voluntary contraction; MVC). We quantified endpoint accuracy (bias error, absolute error), force trajectory dynamics, and first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle activity across different frequency bands. Bias error showed effort-dependent reversal of accuracy, with overshooting at low force levels, maximum accuracy at 30% MVC, and undershooting at high effort levels. Absolute force error decreased with effort, reflecting a 2/3rd power-law trend, indicating an improvement in accuracy with increasing force level regardless of the direction. Trajectory fluctuations and muscle activity changed with effort level, whereas an increase in 8-13 Hz electromyography (EMG) power predicted reductions in bias error from 2-30% MVC. These findings demonstrate an effort-dependent effect on endpoint accuracy and identify trajectory dynamics and muscle activation characteristics that explain endpoint accuracy changes in targeted ballistic contractions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42371107What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.