Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42371106›Full record

ArticleApplied microbiology and biotechnology2026

Comparative production of recombinant capripoxvirus in Vero cells using microcarrier- and macrocarrier-based dynamic cell culture systems under serum-free conditions.

Zhanat Amanova, Zhanna Sametova, Olga Chervyakova, Sholpan Turyskeldy, Alina Kurmasheva, Ruslan Abitayev, Abdurakhman Ussembay, Zhanat Kondibayeva, Dariya Toktyrova, Dana Mazbayeva and 2 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Zhanat AmanovaResearch Institute for Biological Safety Problems, National Holding "QazBioPharm", Gvardeiskiy, 080409, Kazakhstan. zh.amanova@biosafety.kz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3987-6814
Zhanna SametovaResearch Institute for Biological Safety Problems, National Holding "QazBioPharm", Gvardeiskiy, 080409, Kazakhstan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2332-2841
Olga ChervyakovaResearch Institute for Biological Safety Problems, National Holding "QazBioPharm", Gvardeiskiy, 080409, Kazakhstan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7954-6246
Sholpan TuryskeldyResearch Institute for Biological Safety Problems, National Holding "QazBioPharm", Gvardeiskiy, 080409, Kazakhstan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9515-0655
Alina KurmashevaResearch Institute for Biological Safety Problems, National Holding "QazBioPharm", Gvardeiskiy, 080409, Kazakhstan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-9484-0540
Ruslan AbitayevResearch Institute for Biological Safety Problems, National Holding "QazBioPharm", Gvardeiskiy, 080409, Kazakhstan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5609-2491
Abdurakhman UssembayResearch Institute for Biological Safety Problems, National Holding "QazBioPharm", Gvardeiskiy, 080409, Kazakhstan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3639-3793
Zhanat KondibayevaResearch Institute for Biological Safety Problems, National Holding "QazBioPharm", Gvardeiskiy, 080409, Kazakhstan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8224-8047
Dariya ToktyrovaResearch Institute for Biological Safety Problems, National Holding "QazBioPharm", Gvardeiskiy, 080409, Kazakhstan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3166-4515
Dana MazbayevaResearch Institute for Biological Safety Problems, National Holding "QazBioPharm", Gvardeiskiy, 080409, Kazakhstan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-3892-0032
Kuandyk ZhugunissovResearch Institute for Biological Safety Problems, National Holding "QazBioPharm", Gvardeiskiy, 080409, Kazakhstan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4238-5116
Yerbol BulatovResearch Institute for Biological Safety Problems, National Holding "QazBioPharm", Gvardeiskiy, 080409, Kazakhstan. ye.bulatov@biosafety.kz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8543-4219

Funding

Ministry of Health of the Republic of Kazakhstan No. IRN BR25293294
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brucellosis remains one of the most significant zoonotic diseases worldwide, and the absence of licensed human vaccines highlights the need for novel vaccine platforms and reproducible laboratory-scale manufacturing strategies. In the present study, the replication efficiency of a recombinant capripoxvirus expressing a Brucella antigen was evaluated in Vero cells cultured under serum-free conditions using two 3D carrier-based cultivation systems. Vero cells were cultivated in serum-free medium either on Cytodex 1 microcarriers in a 500-mL reusable spinner flask operated in repeated-batch mode or on BioNOC II® macrocarriers in single-use 500-mL BelloCell™ 500AP vessels integrated into the BelloStage™-3000 system and operated according to the Tide Motion principle with medium recirculation. Cells were infected with recombinant SPPV(TKΔ)-OMP16 at a multiplicity of infection of 0.1, and total cell yield, metabolic parameters, and virus production were subsequently monitored throughout cultivation. The microcarrier and macrocarrier systems achieved maximum total cell yields of 7.0 × 10⁸ and 3.1 × 10⁹ cells, respectively. Peak virus titers reached 5.75 log₁₀ TCID₅₀/mL at 120 h post-infection in the microcarrier system and 7.25 log₁₀ TCID₅₀/mL at 168 h post-infection in the macrocarrier system, corresponding to a 1.5 log₁₀ increase in virus titer (p < 0.01). After normalization to the working culture volume, the macrocarrier system exhibited 4.4-fold higher volumetric cell productivity. In addition, virus productivity normalized to the total number of cells present at the time of infection was approximately sevenfold higher than that observed in the microcarrier system. These findings demonstrate that the macrocarrier-based dynamic cultivation system enables superior total cell yield and enhanced recombinant virus production under serum-free laboratory-scale conditions. KEY POINTS: • BioNOC II® macrocarriers increased volumetric cell productivity by 4.4-fold compared with Cytodex 1. • BioNOC II® macrocarriers increased peak virus titers by 1.5 log₁₀ TCID₅₀/mL. • Cell-specific viral productivity was approximately sevenfold higher in the macrocarrier-based bioreactor system.

Indexed as

CapripoxvirusCell Culture TechniquesVirus CultivationAnimalsAntigens, BacterialBioreactorsBrucellaChlorocebus aethiopsCulture Media, Serum-FreeVero CellsVirus ReplicationAntigens, BacterialCulture Media, Serum-Free3D cell cultureAdherent cell cultureBrucellosisProcess intensificationTide MotionViral vector production

Identifiers

PMID42371106
PMCPMC13315109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.