ArticleCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2026
Timing of immune checkpoint inhibitors infusion and prognosis in recurrent/metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a single-center, retrospective study.
Article in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe timing of immunotherapy administration has been linked to variations in clinical outcome across multiple cancers, but its effect on clinical outcome in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) remains unstudied.
methodsIn this single-center retrospective cohort study, patients with recurrent/metastatic (R/M) NPC who received first-line anti-PD-1-based immunochemotherapy (June 2019-December 2024) were included. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) was the secondary endpoint. Data regarding the time of day of administration (ToDA) during the initial four cycles were collected for each patient. Survival was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with log-rank tests. Multivariable Cox models were adjusted for prespecified covariates. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed between patients from different ToDA groups. The ToDA cutoff was derived from the data without a prespecified hypothesis, using a data-driven approach.
resultsAmong the 334 screened patients, 312 met the eligibility criteria. The median follow-up was 24.9 months. The median PFS was 25.0 months, and the mOS was not reached. A data-driven optimal ToDA cutoff of 12:00 was identified. Patients who received immunotherapy after 12:00 had significantly longer PFS (31.2 vs. 18.3 months, p = 0.006) and OS (both not reached, p = 0.011). After PSM at a 1:2 ratio, PFS (36.1 vs. 18.3 months, p = 0.003) and OS (both not reached, p = 0.018) were still significantly improved in patients who received immunotherapy after 12:00. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that a ToDA after 12:00 was independently correlated with improved PFS (HR=0.63; 95% CI: 0.43-0.92; p = 0.017) and OS (HR=0.48; 95% CI: 0.27-0.84; p = 0.010).
conclusionsThese hypothesis-generating findings suggest that, in R/M NPC patients treated with first-line immunochemotherapy, afternoon administration during the initial four cycles may be associated with improved PFS and OS. However, because the ToDA threshold was selected post hoc, the results should be interpreted with caution. Randomized clinical trials are warranted to validate these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.