ArticleUrolithiasis2026
Preoperative prediction of postoperative SIRS and sepsis after ureteroscopic lithotripsy: discriminative performance of large language models.
Article in Urolithiasis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Postoperative systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and sepsis following ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URS) are uncommon but potentially life-threatening complications. No prior study has evaluated large language models (LLMs) for predicting post-URS SIRS/sepsis using exclusively preoperative parameters. This study evaluated the discriminative performance of LLMs in this setting. This retrospective case-control study included 210 patients who underwent URS between January 2024 and December 2025 (42 SIRS/sepsis cases, 168 controls). Risk scores (0-100) were generated using GPT-4o-mini and Gemini 2.5 Flash with guideline-based and intuitive prompting strategies. Discriminative performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic analysis and area under the curve (AUC). Model comparisons were performed using the DeLong test. Patients who developed SIRS/sepsis were older and more frequently female, with larger stones, higher hydronephrosis grade, lower stone density, increased inflammatory markers (urine WBC, leukocyte esterase, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio), higher rates of positive urine culture, and more frequent radiological inflammatory findings (all p<0.001). Total WBC did not differ between groups (p=0.698). All model-prompt combinations showed high discriminative performance (AUC 0.952-0.973). The highest performance was achieved by the GPT-4o-mini intuitive model (AUC 0.973; sensitivity 92.9%; specificity 95.2%). No significant differences were observed between models or prompting strategies. Performance remained high after excluding patients with positive urine culture or preoperative antibiotic use (AUC 0.896-0.943). LLMs demonstrated high discriminative performance for predicting postoperative SIRS/sepsis using only preoperative data, suggesting potential utility as accessible clinical decision-support tools for perioperative risk stratification in URS. Prospective multicenter validation is required before clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42371093What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.