ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2026
Differential temporal responses of heel strike and toe off during split-belt locomotor adaptation.
Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeHuman walking must maintain temporal coordination while adapting to perturbations. However, it remains unclear whether different gait events show similar or distinct temporal responses during adaptive walking. Using split-belt treadmill walking as a model of asymmetric temporal perturbation, we examined inter-event timing variability for heel strike (HS) and toe off (TO) in healthy young adult males.
methodsVariability was quantified as the coefficient of variation (CV) of inter-event intervals during baseline walking, early adaptation, and late adaptation. To assess perturbation-related temporal responses, we also calculated baseline-referenced changes in variability (ΔCV) and their magnitude (|ΔCV|).
resultsHS exhibited higher absolute timing variability across walking phases and larger baseline-referenced changes during split-belt walking. In contrast, TO showed comparatively lower variability and smaller deviations from baseline in the present analysis. Double-support time symmetry was also altered during early adaptation and partially recovered later, indicating concurrent reorganization of whole-gait temporal coordination.
conclusionThese findings suggest that gait events do not contribute uniformly to temporal adjustment during split-belt walking. Event-specific analysis of baseline-referenced variability may therefore provide a useful perspective for describing temporal responses to locomotor perturbation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42371073What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.