Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42371056›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2026

Establishing a standardized biomechanical model for osteoporotic pincer (OF4) Fracture creation in human cadaveric spines: a novel experimental technique.

Biniam Melese Bekele, Ina Moritz, Dorothea Mauracher, Vanessa Gülle, Romed Hörmann, Yu-Mi Ryang, Werner Schmoelz

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Biniam Melese BekeleDepartment of Neurosurgery & Center for Spine Therapy, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany.
Ina MoritzDepartment of Neurosurgery & Center for Spine Therapy, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany.
Dorothea MauracherDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Vanessa GülleDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Romed HörmannDepartment of Anatomy, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Yu-Mi RyangDepartment of Neurosurgery & Center for Spine Therapy, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany.
Werner SchmoelzDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria. werner.schmoelz@i-med.ac.at.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOsteoporotic pincer-type fractures (OF4) represent a distinct and challenging fracture subtype, yet the absence of reproducible experimental models limits scientific opportunities for biomechanical research and the development of tailored treatments. This study describes and validates a standardized method to generate OF4 pincer fractures in human cadaveric spines.

methodsTwelve osteoporotic bisegmental thoracolumbar specimens underwent controlled fracture induction using a servo-hydraulic testing machine. Radiological assessment confirmed fracture morphology consistent with OF4 pincer-type fractures.

resultsOF4 fractures were successfully induced in eight specimens (mean age 73.5 ± 7.5 years; mean BMD 68.4 ± 7.2 mg/cm³). Four specimens were excluded due to fracture patterns inconsistent with OF4 pincer-type morphology (instability, scoliosis, asymmetrical collapse, or comminution). Biomechanical testing revealed significant increases in range of motion post-fracture in flexion/extension (+ 9.6° ± 2.4°, p < 0.001), lateral bending (+ 16.2° ± 7.8°, p < 0.001), and axial rotation (+ 6.0° ± 4.3°, p = 0.01). Central vertebral body height loss reached 55% (p < 0.001), reflecting hallmark characteristics of clinical OF4 pincer fractures.

conclusionThis protocol offers a reproducible and biomechanically validated model of osteoporotic OF4 pincer fractures. It presents a model that can potentially be used for biomechanical evaluation of surgical interventions and the development of novel techniques.

Indexed as

AgeAging spineBiomechanicsCadaveric modelFrailtyGeriatric populationOF4 fractureOF classificationOsteoporosisOsteoporotic fractureOsteoporotic spinePincer fractureSpine fractureVertebral body fracture

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.