Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42371035›Full record

ArticleNeuroradiology2026

Comparative study of radiomics features between ASL and DSC perfusion-weighted imaging in distinguishing radiation-induced brain injury from glioma recurrence.

Yanhua Li, Guoli Liu, Jun Zhang, Mingxiao Wang, Xinyue Zhang, Yahong Tan, Lin Ma

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroradiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yanhua LiDepartment of Radiology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Guoli LiuDepartment of Radiology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jun ZhangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, The Sixth Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Mingxiao WangDepartment of Radiology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xinyue ZhangBeijing Shijitan Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yahong TanDepartment of Radiology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Lin MaDepartment of Radiology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China. cjr.malin@vip.163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the radiomics features of pseudocontinuous arterial spin labeling (ASL) and dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) perfusion-weighted imaging in distinguishing radiation-induced brain injury (RIBI) from tumor recurrence (TR) in patients with diffuse gliomas. MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 131 patients with pathologically confirmed adult-type diffuse gliomas, presenting with newly developed abnormal enhancing lesions after standard radiotherapy, were included for model development. Lesion segmentation was performed manually by two raters using ITK-SNAP and the segmentation consistency was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). A total of 1015 radiomics features were extracted from the segmented areas of T2WI, T1WI, contrast-enhanced T1WI (CE-T1WI), cerebral blood flow (CBF) maps from ASL, and relative cerebral blood flow (rCBF) maps from DSC, respectively. Feature selection was conducted via t-tests, and an elastic net regression (ENR) algorithm combined with recursive feature elimination (RFE) with cross-validation was used to identify the important features. Four machine learning classifiers were employed to establish radiomics models. Diagnostic performance was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC) in conventional (T2WI+T1WI + CE-T1WI), ASL-CBF, DSC-rCBF, conventional + ASL-CBF, and conventional + DSC-rCBF radiomics models, respectively. The optimal models were further validated in an independent validation set (n = 37).

resultsSix features from ASL-CBF, five from DSC-rCBF, one from T1WI, one from T2WI, and four from CE-T1WI were identified as the most significant features. The K-nearest neighbor (KNN) classifier was selected as the optimal classifier. In the training set, both ASL-CBF (AUC = 0.962) and DSC-rCBF (AUC = 0.946) radiomics models demonstrated satisfactory diagnostic performance, surpassing that of conventional MRI radiomics model (AUC = 0.844). The diagnostic accuracy was further improved when integrating DSC-rCBF features into conventional MRI models (AUC = 0.971). In the independent validation set, the ASL-CBF, conventional + ASL-CBF and conventional + DSC-rCBF models achieved satisfactory performance, with AUC of 0.955, 0.968 and 0.960. While the DSC-rCBF model alone showed an AUC of 0.887 and decreased specificity (58.3%), and the conventional model demonstrated decreased AUC of 0.720 and specificity (33.3%).

conclusionIn this exploratory study, radiomics features derived from both ASL-CBF and DSC-rCBF showed promise in distinguishing RIBI from TR. Integrating perfusion features into conventional MRI enhanced model accuracy. These preliminary findings suggest ASL-based radiomics as a viable, non-contrast alternative; however, these results should be interpreted with caution due to the modest validation sample size and single-center design. They require validation in larger, prospective, multi-center cohorts before clinical implementation.

Indexed as

Brain InjuriesBrain NeoplasmsGliomaMagnetic Resonance AngiographyNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRadiation InjuriesAdultAgedDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPerfusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingRadiomicsReproducibility of ResultsSpin LabelsArterial spin labelingDiffuse gliomaDynamic susceptibility contrastRadiation-induced brain injuryRadiomics featuresTumor recurrence

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.