ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2026
Deep learning approach for analyzing regional scheimpflug corneal images to assess keratoconus progression.
Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo use deep learning models on baseline Scheimpflug corneal images from three different corneal regions to discriminate progressive from nonprogressive keratoconus.
methodsA total of 562 eyes of 325 keratoconus patients were included in the study. The eyes were classified as those with progression (n = 300) and without progression (n = 262) according to the Pentacam Belin ABCD progression display (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany). Images of the whole cornea, central 5-mm zone, and central 3-mm zone from Pentacam tomography maps (anterior and posterior axial/sagittal curvature, anterior and posterior tangential curvature, anterior and posterior elevation, corneal thickness) obtained at the patients' baseline visit were used to train and test two convolutional neural network models (YOLOv8L and YOLOv8X).
resultsThe central 3-mm zone of the posterior axial/sagittal curvature map (in YOLOv8L) and posterior tangential curvature map (in YOLOv8X) had the highest test accuracy in discriminating progressive from nonprogressive cases (70% [95% CI, 57-80%] for both). Sensitivity and specificity values were 74% (95% CI, 56-86%) and 68% (95% CI, 49-83%) for the posterior axial/sagittal curvature map; 92% (95% CI, 77-98%) and 63% (95% CI, 44-79%) for the posterior tangential curvature map, respectively.
conclusionsUsing the YOLOv8L and YOLOv8X deep learning models, the central 3-mm zone of the posterior axial/sagittal and posterior tangential curvature maps appeared comparatively more informative in identifying progressive keratoconus. These preliminary findings suggest that deep learning models may have the potential to distinguish keratoconus progression by analyzing the central 3-mm posterior corneal maps, although further studies incorporating clinical risk factors are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42371030What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.