Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42371021›Full record

ReviewAbdominal radiology (New York)2026

Artificial intelligence in the imaging diagnosis of gallbladder and bile duct stones: a systematic review.

Ali Hajihashemi, Mohammadsadegh Kalantary, Mohammadreza Elhaie, Abolfazl Koozari

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ali HajihashemiIsfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Islamic Republic of Iran.
Mohammadsadegh KalantaryIsfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Islamic Republic of Iran.
Mohammadreza ElhaieIsfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Islamic Republic of Iran. mrelhaie@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1186-353X
Abolfazl KoozariAhvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvāz, Islamic Republic of Iran. abolfazlkoozari2@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGallbladder and bile duct stones (cholelithiasis and choledocholithiasis) represent a major global health burden. Conventional imaging modalities have well-recognised limitations in sensitivity, operator dependence, and accessibility. Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a potential adjunct to improve diagnostic accuracy, yet the evidence base remains unsynthesised.

methodsA systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Seven major databases were searched without language or date restrictions. Studies evaluating any AI algorithm for the detection, segmentation, or classification of gallbladder or bile duct stones on medical images were included. Risk of bias was assessed with QUADAS-2 and evidence certainty with GRADE and a Qualitative synthesis was performed.

resultsThirteen studies (n > 7,700 patients, > 130,000 images) met inclusion criteria. Owing to substantial clinical and methodological heterogeneity, meta-analysis was not performed and findings were synthesized qualitatively. AI models, predominantly convolutional neural networks applied to ultrasound reported accuracies of 71.5-99.63% and AUC values of 0.79-0.99. Performance was highest for multi-class gallbladder disease classification and choledocholithiasis detection on MRCP. Twelve of 13 studies (92%) carried high risk of bias; overall certainty of evidence was rated very low.

conclusionAI demonstrates promising diagnostic performance for biliary stones; however, methodological limitations and lack of robust external validation preclude routine clinical adoption. Prospective, multicenter studies with real-world validation are urgently required.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCholedocholithiasisCholelithiasisDiagnostic ImagingMachine LearningNeural Networks

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.