Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42371007›Full record

ArticleUrologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026

[Generational shift in clinical urological care: status quo in German urology].

Sophie Knipper, Maria-Noemi Welte, Raisa Abrams-Pompe, Laura Bellut, Eva Maria Greiser, Annika Herlemann-Tilke, Karina Müller, Sandra Schönburg, Carolin Siech, Sarah Weinberger and 2 more

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Sophie KnipperKlinik für Urologie, Vivantes Klinikum am Urban, Berlin, Deutschland.
Maria-Noemi WelteKlinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum, Goethe Universität Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Deutschland. welte@urogate.de.
Raisa Abrams-PompeKlinikum Herford, Universitätsklinik für Urologie, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Campus OWL, Herford, Deutschland.
Laura BellutKlinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Deutschland.
Eva Maria GreiserMathias-Spital, Klinikum Rheine, Rheine, Deutschland.
Annika Herlemann-TilkeUrologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Campus Großhadern, LMU München, München, Deutschland.
Karina MüllerUrologische Klinik, Klinikum Bremen Mitte, Bremen, Deutschland.
Sandra SchönburgNeuro-Urologie, BG-Klinikum Bergmannstrost, Halle (Saale), Deutschland.
Carolin SiechKlinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum, Goethe Universität Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Deutschland.
Sarah WeinbergerUrologische Klinik, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland.
Laura WiemerUrologische Klinik, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland.
Margarete Teresa WalachKlinik für Urologie und Urochirurgie, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Mannheim, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesUrological care in Germany is facing challenges due to high workload, an increasing desire for more flexible working time models, and the need to secure the next generation of professionals. Against this backdrop, workload, working time models, and job satisfaction among urologists in Germany were examined. MATERIALS AND

methodsA nationwide online survey (mailing lists of Deutsche Gesellschaft für Urologie [DGU], Bundesverband der deutschen Urologie [BvDU], German Society of Residents in Urology [GeSRU]) conducted from October-December 2024 collected data on demographics, qualifications, work environment, workload, job satisfaction, and family situation among practicing urologists.

resultsOf the 999 participants (66% male, 34% female, 0.1% diverse), 61% held a doctoral degree, 8% were habilitated (4% with a professorship), and 19% were involved in research. Most (73%) were surgically active; 67% focused on general urology and 36% on conservative-oncological care. While 74% worked full-time (≥ 40 h/week), 54% reported ≥ 50 h/week including overtime and on-call duties. The majority worked in outpatient settings (53%), 43% in inpatient care, and 2% in research, industry, or public service. Half lived with at least one child under 18. Parental leave had been taken by 31%, with 56% of them for more than 6 months. Overall, 80% reported a high or very high workload, 54% wished to reduce working hours, yet 56% were satisfied or very satisfied with their current job situation.

conclusionThe survey highlights a high workload combined with still considerable satisfaction with the profession among urologists in Germany. However, the majority desire a reduction in actual working hours, which indicates a need for structural adjustments to ensure the long-term attractiveness of the field of urology.

Indexed as

Job SatisfactionUrologistsUrologyWorkloadAdultFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesWorking ConditionsEnsuring future workforceGenerational shiftJob satisfactionStatus quo analysisWorking time modelWorkload

Identifiers

PMID42371007
PMCPMC13503498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.