Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42370999›Full record

Trial reportIntensive care medicine2026

HIgh versus STAndard blood Pressure target in hypertensive high-risk patients undergoing elective major abdominal surgery: the HISTAP multicenter randomized clinical trial.

Maurizio Cecconi, Andrea Cortegiani, Alberto Noto, Giovanni Sotgiu, Massimo Antonelli, Marco Anderloni, Ilaria Barbaresco, Federico Bizzarri, Andrea Brunati, Iacopo Cappellini and 33 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Intensive care medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05637606 (HIgh Versus STAndard Blood Pressure Target in Hypertensive High-risk Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05637606 nacompletednot on this map

HIgh Versus STAndard Blood Pressure Target in Hypertensive High-risk Patients: The HISTAP Randomized Clinical Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorHumanitas Clinical and Research CenterRan2023 to 2025Enrolled636ConditionsBlood Pressure, Complication,Postoperative, Intraoperative HypotensionArmsEphedrine, Norepinephrine, Etilefrine Hydrochloride bolus, Use of pulse pressure and stroke volume variation (PPV and SVV), use of Mini Fluid Challenge (mini_FC)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

43 authors.

Maurizio CecconiIRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milano, Italy.
Andrea CortegianiDepartment of Precision Medicine in Medical, Surgical and Critical Care (Me. Pre.C.C.), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Alberto NotoDivision of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Department of Human Pathology of the Adult and Evolutive Age "Gaetano Barresi", University of Messina, Policlinico "G. Martino", Messina, Italy.
Giovanni SotgiuClinical Epidemiology and Medical Statistics Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Pharmacy, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
Massimo AntonelliDepartment of Emergency, Anesthesiology and Resuscitation Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy.
Marco AnderloniUnit of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care B, AOUI-University Hospital Integrated Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Ilaria BarbarescoOspedale Santa Maria Degli Angeli, Pordenone, Italy.
Federico BizzarriAzienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Andrea BrunatiIRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milano, Italy.
Iacopo CappelliniAnestesia e Rianimazione, Azienda USL Toscana Centro, Ospedale Santo Stefano, Prato, Italy.
Gianmaria CammarotaAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Alessandria, Alessandria, Italy.
Mariagiovanna CaporaleDepartment of Emergency, Anesthesiology and Resuscitation Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy.
Francesca CollinoDepartment of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Emergency, "Città della Salute e della Scienza" Hospital, Torino, Italy.
Monica CuscheraAzienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Irene ColorettiDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy.
Katia DonadelloUnit of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care B, AOUI-University Hospital Integrated Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Lorenzo FotiDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Firenze, Italy.
Luciano FrassanitoDepartment of Emergency, Anesthesiology and Resuscitation Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy.
Diego FiumeUOC Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Sant'Eugenio Hospital, Roma, Italy.
Massimo GirardisDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy.
Camilla L'AcquaDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy.
Gianluigi LauroAzienda Ospedaliera di Rilievo Nazionale Antonio Cardarelli, Napoli, Italy.
Salvatore Maurizio MaggioreUniversity Department of Medicine and Surgery, Libera Università del Mediterraneo-LUM University, Casamassima (BARI), Italy.
Sandra MagnoniDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Pharmacy, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
Lucia MirabellaDepartment of Medical and Surgical Science, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Giovanni MisseriFondazione Istituto G. Giglio di Cefalù, Palermo, Italy.
Sara MioriOspedale Santa Chiara, Trento, Italy.
Guia Margherita MatronolaIRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milano, Italy.
Gaia PavanUnit of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care B, AOUI-University Hospital Integrated Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Tommaso PellisOspedale Santa Maria Degli Angeli, Pordenone, Italy.
Federico PiccioniIRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milano, Italy.
Mariangela Valentina PuciDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Enna Kore, Enna, Italy.
Sara PuglieseIRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milano, Italy.
Bruno RomanòDepartment of Emergency, Anesthesiology and Resuscitation Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy.
Andrea RussoDepartment of Emergency, Anesthesiology and Resuscitation Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy.
Nicolò SamuelliIRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milano, Italy.
Vito TorranoDepartment of Emergency and Urgency, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milano, Italy.
Andrea VianiAzienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Samir JaberDépartement d'Anesthésie Réanimation B, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Elie AzoulayAssistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Saint-Louis University Hospital, Medical Intensive Care-Famiréa Research Group, Paris, France.
Stefano RomagnoliDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Firenze, Italy.
Antonio MessinaIRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milano, Italy. antonio.messina@humanitas.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9744-1659
SIAARTI Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe optimal mean arterial pressure (MAP) target in high-risk hypertensive patients undergoing major abdominal surgery remains unclear. The HISTAP trial evaluated whether targeting an intraoperative MAP ≥ 80 compared with ≥ 65 mmHg reduces postoperative organ dysfunction and 30-day mortality, in this population.

methodsHISTAP was a multicenter, randomized trial conducted at 18 Italian centers between March 2023 and April 2025. The study included patients aged ≥ 60 years with chronic hypertension requiring home therapy, undergoing elective major abdominal surgery and having at least one additional high-risk criterion. The intraoperative MAP was targeted to ≥ 80 mmHg (Treatment group) or ≥ 65 mmHg (Control group). The primary outcome was a composite endpoint including postoperative mortality and at least one major organ dysfunction.

findingsOf 636 randomized patients, 6 were excluded since surgery was canceled after randomization, 630 completed the trial and were included in the intention-to-treat analysis (median age, 74 years [IQR, 69-79]). Mean intraoperative MAP was 77 ± 7 mmHg in the Control group and 88 ± 9 mmHg in the Treatment group. The primary composite outcome occurred in 48.9% of patients in the Control group versus 38.1% of patients in the Treatment group (relative risk, 0.78; 95% CI 0.65-0.93; P = 0.006). Acute kidney injury was significantly less frequent in the Treatment group (23.5 vs. 33.7%; P = 0.005).

interpretationAmong hypertensive patients receiving continuous hemodynamic monitoring and protocolized fluid therapy at increased postoperative risk undergoing major abdominal surgery, targeting an intraoperative MAP ≥ 80 mmHg, compared with ≥ 65 mmHg, reduced major organ dysfunction, primarily due to fewer mild-to-moderate acute kidney injuries.

trial registrationThe HISTAP trial has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05637606 (Date of registration: 24 November 2022).

Indexed as

AbdomenBlood PressureElective Surgical ProceduresHypertensionAgedFemaleHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRisk FactorsFluid therapyHemodynamic monitoringIntraoperative blood pressureIntraoperative hypotensionPostoperative organ dysfunction

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.