Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42370958›Full record

SynthesisWorld journal of urology2026

Elevated prostate specific antigen due to indwelling urethral catheterisation: myth or fact? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Hoi Pong Nicholas Wong, Rachel Shu-En Lau, Lin Kyaw, Aryan Parab, Wei Jing Kelven Chen, Wei Tim Loke, Edmund Chiong, Yu Xi Terence Law

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in World journal of urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hoi Pong Nicholas WongDepartment of Urology, National University Hospital, National University Health System, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119074, Singapore. nichwong9@gmail.com.
Rachel Shu-En LauDepartment of Urology, National University Hospital, National University Health System, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119074, Singapore.
Lin KyawDepartment of Urology, National University Hospital, National University Health System, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119074, Singapore.
Aryan ParabLee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, 11 Mandalay Road, Singapore, 308207, Singapore.
Wei Jing Kelven ChenDepartment of Urology, National University Hospital, National University Health System, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119074, Singapore.
Wei Tim LokeDepartment of Urology, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, National University Health System, 1 Jurong East Street 21, Singapore, 609606, Singapore.
Edmund ChiongDepartment of Urology, National University Hospital, National University Health System, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119074, Singapore. surce@nus.edu.sg.
Yu Xi Terence LawDepartment of Urology, National University Hospital, National University Health System, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119074, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

INTRODUCTION &

objectivesProstate-specific antigen (PSA) testing is central to prostate cancer diagnosis, yet values may be confounded by urethral catheterisation. Misinterpretation of PSA rises can prompt unnecessary investigations or delay critical diagnoses. We systematically evaluated what the effect of urethral catheterisation in adult men is on serum PSA levels when compared to pre-catheterisation values.

methodsA systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Scopus through July 2025 was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Eligible studies included adult males with pre- and post-catheterisation PSA values amongst other criteria. Pooled mean differences were calculated with a random-effects model. Study quality was further assessed using the NIH/NHLBI Quality Assessment Tool for Before-After (Pre-Post) Studies With No Control Group.

resultsOf the 1677 records identified, ten pre-post studies met the inclusion criteria, of which nine were eligible for quantitative meta-analyses comprising 386 patients. Seven studies assessed PSA within 24 h of catheterisation. Pooled analysis demonstrated a statistically significant mean increase of 0.48 ng/mL (95% CI 0.23-0.74, p < 0.001). For catheterisation lasting 24-72 h, pooled analysis of seven studies similarly showed a significant increase of 0.33 ng/mL (95% CI 0.17-0.50, p < 0.001). Beyond 72 h, the pooled estimates of PSA change were imprecise and statistically insignificant (mean difference 1.70ng/mL, 95% CI -0.92-4.32, p = 0.20). Overall, the nine studies have demonstrated a statistically significant mean increase of 0.69 ng/mL (95% CI 0.35-1.03, p < 0.001). Further subgroup analyses in patients with urinary retention yielded statistically insignificant rises, and patients who did not have retention of urine demonstrated a statistically significant yet minimal mean increase of 0.28 ng/mL (95% CI 0.20-0.36, p < 0.001) that is likely of limited clinical relevance. Most studies were judged to be of fair methodological quality with common limitations including small sample sizes and potential confounding by underlying pathologies, amongst others.

conclusionsIndwelling Urethral Catheter placement for up to 72 h is associated with a statistically significant but clinically small and modest rise in serum PSA. These findings suggest that short-term catheterisation is unlikely to meaningfully distort PSA-based clinical decision-making. However, PSA interpretation in patients with prolonged catheterisation (≥ 72 h) remains uncertain, highlighting the need for further prospective studies to define optimal testing intervals.

Indexed as

Catheters, IndwellingProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsUrinary CatheterizationHumansMaleProstate-Specific AntigenCatheterisationIndwelling urinary catheterProstate specific antigenPSA

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.