ArticleEndocrine connections2026
Group education improves self-management of adrenal insufficiency in patients and their relative.
Article in Endocrine connections, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveSelf-management and patient education are cornerstones in managing adrenal insufficiency (AI) to prevent adrenal crisis (AC). Glucocorticoid (GC) education group meetings are increasingly being incorporated into regular healthcare. However, few studies have evaluated its effectiveness.
designThis is a multicentre pre-post intervention study conducted at four university hospitals in Sweden between 2015 and 2019.
methodsA total of 254 patients with AI along with 138 relatives were included. Participants attended a GC education group meeting led by an endocrinologist. Detailed guidance was provided on when and how to adjust GC doses to prevent AC together with instructions and supervised practice of hydrocortisone injections. Questionnaires on self-management were completed by both patients and relatives before the session and again 6 months later. In addition, patients also completed two HRQoL instruments.
resultsPatients with AI felt relatively safe and informed about their GC treatment at baseline. However, many lacked adequate knowledge on dose adjustments, including high-risk situations for AC. At follow up, 194 patients (76.4%) and 94 relatives (68.1%) completed the questionnaires. Both patients and relatives showed significant improvements in perceived safety and management of high-risk scenarios for AC. However, some knowledge gaps persisted. The education effort did not result in significant changes in HRQoL.
conclusionStructured GC education group meetings enhance the knowledge of patients and their relatives to manage AI safely. We consider this a valuable component of AI care. SIGNIFICANCE: We highlight the value of repeating sick-day rules and using group education to improve self-management in patients with AI and their relatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.