ArticleGlobal spine journal2026
L5 Is a Reliable Lower Instrumented Vertebra in Selected Adult Spinal Deformity Patients.
Article in Global spine journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Study DesignRetrospective analysis of a multicenter prospective adult spinal deformity (ASD) database.ObjectiveIn ASD surgery, fusion to the sacropelvis improves stability but increases morbidity. Stopping at L5 preserves motion but predisposes to distal junctional failure (DJF). This study aims to identify risk factors for DJF in ASD patients undergoing posterior fusion with lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) at L5.MethodsPatients undergoing posterior fusion with LIV-L5 and minimum two-years follow-up were included. Demographic data, radiographic parameters, and patient-reported outcome measures were collected. The primary endpoint was surgical extension to the pelvis (EP) for DJF. Patients were divided into EP and NoEP. Survival analysis and multivariate regression were used to identify predictors of DJF and postoperative malalignment.ResultsEighty-one patients met inclusion criteria, with a mean follow-up of 4.50 years. Fifteen patients (18.5%) required EP due to DJF. The EP group demonstrated significantly worse preoperative global alignment, including higher sagittal vertical axis (SVA) and global tilt. Postoperative SVA was a strong predictor of DJF: patients with postoperative SVA >45 mm had a 5-year survival free from EP of 48.6%, compared with 95.1% in well-aligned patients (p<0.001). Multivariate analysis identified older age and higher preoperative SVA as independent risk factors for postoperative malalignment.ConclusionsChoosing L5 as LIV is safe in well-aligned ASD patients, with approximately 80% remaining free from pelvic extension at five years. Inadequate postoperative sagittal correction, significantly increases the risk of DJF. Older patients with preoperative malalignment may benefit from primary fusion to the sacrum.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.