Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42370632›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2026

Obesity and Keratoconus: A Mediation Study Based on the Chinese Keratoconus Cohort.

Kaili Yang, Anqi Chang, Runqi Tu, Liyan Xu, Yuwei Gu, Qi Fan, Shanshan Yin, Yi Yuan, Yifan Wang, Chenchen Yin and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Kaili YangHenan Provincial People's Hospital, Henan Eye Hospital, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, People's Republic of China.
Anqi ChangHenan University People's Hospital, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Henan Eye Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, People's Republic of China.
Runqi TuHenan Provincial People's Hospital, Henan Eye Hospital, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, People's Republic of China.
Liyan XuHenan Provincial People's Hospital, Henan Eye Hospital, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, People's Republic of China.
Yuwei GuHenan Provincial People's Hospital, Henan Eye Hospital, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, People's Republic of China.
Qi FanHenan Provincial People's Hospital, Henan Eye Hospital, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, People's Republic of China.
Shanshan YinHenan Provincial People's Hospital, Henan Eye Hospital, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, People's Republic of China.
Yi YuanPeople's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Henan Eye Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, People's Republic of China.
Yifan WangPeople's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Henan Eye Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, People's Republic of China.
Chenchen YinPeople's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Henan Eye Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, People's Republic of China.
Yonghao ZangXinxiang Medical University, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Henan Eye Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, People's Republic of China.
Changxiu LiHenan Provincial People's Hospital, Henan Eye Hospital, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, People's Republic of China.
Chenjiu PangHenan Provincial People's Hospital, Henan Eye Hospital, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, People's Republic of China.
Daniela OehringSchool of Health and Human Sciences, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
Yibin HaoHenan Provincial People's Hospital, Henan Eye Hospital, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, People's Republic of China.
Shengwei RenHenan Provincial People's Hospital, Henan Eye Hospital, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Growing evidence indicates a strong association between obesity and keratoconus (KC), although the potential mediating factors remain largely unknown. This study aimed to explore the potential pathways through which corneal biomechanical and topographic parameters might link obesity and KC using structural equation modeling (SEM). Methods: This case-control study included 759 participants (363 patients with KC and 396 controls) from the Chinese Keratoconus (CKC) Cohort Study. Associations among body mass index (BMI), corneal biomechanical parameters, topographic parameters, and KC were analyzed using generalized linear regression models. SEM was used to construct latent variables for corneal biomechanical and topographic parameters. Three mediation models (single, parallel multiple, and serial multiple mediation) were used to examine the mediating roles of these parameters in the association between BMI and KC. Results: After adjusting for confounders, the odds ratio (OR) for BMI and KC was 1.14 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.07-1.22). All corneal biomechanical and topographic parameters showed significant associations with KC (P < 0.05). In the single mediation model, the indirect effect of corneal biomechanical parameters was 0.023 (95% CI = 0.002-0.045), whereas that of topographic parameters was 0.049 (95% CI = 0.023-0.073). The parallel multiple mediation model yielded a total indirect effect of 0.033 (95% CI = 0.013-0.053), with significant pathways through corneal biomechanical parameters (effect = 0.011, 95% CI = 0.000-0.022, 17.2% of total effect) and topographic parameters (effect = 0.022, 95% CI = 0.010-0.038, 35.4% of total effect). A serial mediation pathway was also identified, in which BMI correlated with corneal biomechanical parameters, which subsequently linked to topographic parameters and then KC (effect = 0.021, 95% CI = 0.002-0.039, 32.3% of total effect). Conclusions: Higher BMI was associated with KC. The association between BMI and KC may be partially explained by alterations in corneal biomechanical and topographic parameters, providing a statistical model for understanding potential underlying links in the disease. Translational Relevance: For patients with obesity, KC-related screening should be emphasized, and health management for patients with KC and obesity should be strengthened in clinical practice.

Indexed as

CorneaKeratoconusObesityAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaBody Mass IndexCase-Control StudiesChinaCohort StudiesCorneal TopographyEast Asian PeopleFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42370632
PMCPMC13326853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.