ArticleJournal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association2026
Alignment of Australian Hospital Nutrition Standards With National and International Evidence-Based Guidelines: A Scoping Review.
Article in Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Alignment of Australian Hospital Nutrition Standards With National and International Evidence-Based Guidelines: A Scoping Review.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hospital malnutrition remains highly prevalent in Australia and contributes to poorer clinical outcomes and increased healthcare costs. Hospital nutrition standards play a critical role in ensuring nutritionally adequate menus and supporting patient intake. While Australian jurisdictions have developed hospital nutrition standards, the extent of their consistency and alignment with national and international evidence-based guidelines has not been systematically examined. This scoping review aimed to identify and compare existing hospital nutrition standards across Australia and assess their alignment with the Australian Dietary Guidelines (ADG) and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) hospital nutrition guidelines. Guided by JBI methodology for scoping reviews and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) reporting guidelines, grey literature searches were conducted across government websites, national repositories, and targeted Google searches. Twelve documents met inclusion criteria, including six nutrition standards and six supporting documents. Directed content analysis guided by ADG and ESPEN deductive frameworks was used to extract and compare data across jurisdictions. Findings showed strong alignment with the ADG, particularly in five food group provision and macronutrient targets. Alignment with ESPEN guidelines was more variable. All jurisdictions met minimum energy and protein targets and offered patient menu choices; however, inconsistencies were observed in therapeutic diet provisions, macronutrient distribution, food service considerations, adaptations for diverse patient groups and monitoring practices. Hospital nutrition standards in Australia are fragmented. Developing a unified evidence-based standard integrating ADG principles with ESPEN hospital nutrition recommendations could enhance consistency, quality, and equity in hospital nutrition care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.