Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42370479›Full record

ArticleJournal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association2026

Exploring Eating Patterns and Cooking Habits Among Emerging Adult College Students to Inform a Pilot Meal Kit Program.

Emma Watras, Noereem Z Mena, Kelley Strout, Kayla Gayer, Kathryn Yerxa, Jade McNamara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Emma WatrasSchool of Food and Agriculture, University of Maine, Orono, Maine, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-4161-0024
Noereem Z MenaCollege of Life Sciences and Agriculture, University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7799-5566
Kelley StroutSchool of Nursing, University of Maine, Orono, Maine, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2575-1041
Kayla GayerSchool of Food and Agriculture, University of Maine, Orono, Maine, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9038-0152
Kathryn YerxaCooperative Extension, University of Maine, Orono, Maine, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9510-6358
Jade McNamaraSchool of Food and Agriculture, University of Maine, Orono, Maine, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3242-330X

Funding

National Pork Board
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEmerging adult college students often experience poor diet quality (DQ) and rely heavily on ultra-processed foods (UPFs), such as sugary beverages, salty snacks, sweet snacks, and other calorie-dense, convenience foods. Meal kits, which provide pre-portioned ingredients and simple recipes, may offer a practical strategy to support healthier eating among emerging adults, yet their relevance and feasibility in college settings remain poorly understood. This study aims to assess the health behaviors, needs, and preferences of the target college student population to inform the development and feasibility of a pilot meal kit program.

methodsThis exploratory, community-informed research used a multi-method approach implemented in two phases: (1) an electronic survey of undergraduate students assessing sociodemographics, eating patterns, and meal preparation habits, and (2) virtual focus groups exploring protein intake, cooking behaviors, and desired meal-kit features. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Pearson correlations, and logistic regression models. Qualitative data were coded using inductive thematic analysis.

resultsStudents (N = 501) demonstrated low DQ (sHEI = 47.7 ± 10.0/100), and 33.7% reported low or very low food security. Higher UPF intake (OR = 1.14, 95% CI [1.02, 1.25], p = 0.015), more frequent cooking (OR = 1.31, 95% CI [1.02, 1.70], p = 0.037), and greater food insecurity (OR = 1.08, 95% CI [1.003, 1.16], p = 0.042) significantly predicted interest in meal kits, although effect sizes were small (Nagelkerke R

conclusionEmerging adult college students face numerous barriers to healthy eating. Many view meal kits as a practical way to access convenient, nutritious meals. Affordable, culturally and economically tailored programs may help improve DQ and reduce reliance on UPFs. Findings support pilot testing a campus-based meal-kit program.

Indexed as

CookingDiet, HealthyFeeding BehaviorMealsStudentsAdolescentAdultFast FoodsFemaleFocus GroupsFood PreferencesFood, ProcessedHealth BehaviorHumansMalePilot Projectscollege studentscooking behaviorsdiet qualityemerging adultsfood insecuritymeal kitsultra‐processed foods

Identifiers

PMID42370479
PMCPMC13454157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.