Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42370387›Full record

ArticleJournal of cytology

Usefulness of Cytokeratin Fragment Antigen 21-1 Estimation in Fine-Needle Aspiration Washout Specimens in Diagnosis of Axillary Breast Cancer Metastasis.

Mohit Jadli, Gaurav Rajendra Shirsath, Akanksha Gupta, Erna Ahsan, Farhanul Huda, Nilotpal Chowdhury

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cytology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mohit JadliMultidisciplinary Research Unit, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.
Gaurav Rajendra ShirsathDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.
Akanksha GuptaDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.
Erna AhsanDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.
Farhanul HudaDepartment of General Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.
Nilotpal ChowdhuryDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) is a valuable technique for diagnosing axillary breast cancer metastasis. However, its sensitivity can sometimes be affected by sampling errors and technical artifacts. Aim: We examined whether cytokeratin fragment antigen 21-1 (CYFRA) estimation by manual enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) on FNAB needle washouts could add diagnostic information to FNAB. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study involved FNAB from 138 lymph nodes in 108 suspected breast cancer patients. Papanicolaou and May-Grünwald-Giemsa smears were prepared for cytological examination. CYFRA was estimated by manual ELISA from fine-needle washouts after smear preparation. A cut-off of 1.93 ng/mL was considered to be a positive test for CYFRA. Results: The CYFRA estimates were significantly associated with the FNAB results ( Conclusion: CYFRA estimation by manual ELISA is a simple and accurate test which supplements and enhances the diagnostic usefulness of axillary FNAB in suspected breast cancer metastasis.

Indexed as

Breast cancerCYFRA 21-1ELISAfine-needle aspiration biopsylymphatic metastasis

Identifiers

PMID42370387
PMCPMC13299089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.