ReviewJournal of cytology
Cervical Cancer Screening in the Molecular Era: Integrating Cytology, Human Papillomavirus Testing, and Biomarkers.
Review in Journal of cytology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cervical cancer screening has evolved immensely with advances in molecular diagnostics and improved understanding of human papillomavirus (HPV)-mediated carcinogenesis. While conventional cervical cytology has historically played a pivotal role in reductions in cervical cancer incidence and mortality, its limitations have led to the development of liquid-based cytology (LBC) and HPV-based testing. LBC offers improved sample adequacy, better preservation of cellular morphology, and permits the use of residual material for ancillary testing. HPV DNA testing, particularly as a primary screening modality, provides high sensitivity for detecting high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. In addition, emerging biomarkers such as p16INK4a and Ki-67 dual staining enhance risk stratification and triage of HPV-positive women. Despite the growing adoption of primary HPV screening, cytology remains indispensable for morphologic assessment, detection of HPV-independent lesions, and clinical correlation. An integrated approach combining HPV testing, cytology, and biomarkers represents the most effective strategy for cervical cancer screening. Such a balanced model is essential for optimizing diagnostic accuracy, guiding management, and supporting global efforts toward cervical cancer elimination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.