ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2026
Interpretable machine learning model for predicting postoperative hypoproteinemia in middle-aged and elderly patients following total joint arthroplasty: a multicenter retrospective study.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Postoperative hypoproteinemia is a prevalent yet frequently overlooked complication following total hip or knee arthroplasty (TJA), adversely impacting wound healing and postoperative recovery in patients. This study aims to identify and evaluate the risk factors associated with hypoproteinemia in middle-aged and elderly patients after TJA, as well as to develop and validate an interpretable machine learning model for predicting high-risk patients promptly. Materials and method: This study employed a multicenter retrospective research design, gathering clinical data from middle-aged and elderly patients who underwent TJA surgery across two hospitals. Key predictors were identified and selected using minimum absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression. The predictive performance of eight machine learning algorithms was compared, and the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis was conducted to rank the features and assess the interpretability of the optimal model. Results: A total of 1,383 participants were evaluated, including 585 patients (mean age: 65 ± 10; 233 men) in the training cohort, 250 patients (mean age: 65 ± 9; 101 men) in the internal validation cohort, and 548 patients (mean age: 69 ± 10; 186 men) in the external validation cohort. Key predictors identified include age, surgery time, anesthesia method, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and serum calcium level. Notably, the Light Gradient Boost Machine (LightGBM) model exhibited the highest predictive performance, with AUC values of 1.000, 0.968, and 0.855 in the training, internal validation, and external validation sets, respectively. Consequently, an interpretable LightGBM model incorporating five variables was established. SHAP analysis showed that age, ESR, surgery time, serum calcium level and anesthesia method made significant contributions to the prediction of postoperative hypoproteinemia. Finally, we present the model as an accessible web-based tool for individualized, real-time clinical decision-making (https://hypoproteinemia-prediction-uzhpp3jadq8ryey4jxq3qe.streamlit.app/). Conclusion: This study successfully developed and validated a machine learning prediction model that exhibit high accuracy and interpretability. This model demonstrates high accuracy and interpretability in predicting the risk of hypoproteinemia following TJA and elucidates intricate nonlinear relationships among various factors. It may serve as a promising tool for early risk screening and proactive prevention, though further prospective validation is needed before routine clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.