Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42370345›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2026

Does economic growth always improve residents' dietary nutrition? Long-run relationships and phase differences in China from 1961 to 2018.

Junda Shen, Yichuan Zeng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Junda ShenInternational College Beijing, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Yichuan ZengCollege of Economics and Management, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: China has experienced sustained economic growth alongside major changes in agricultural institutions, food circulation, and market openness. Whether economic growth improves residents' dietary nutrition under these changing conditions remains unclear. Methods: We use annual data for China from 1961 to 2018 to examine the long-run relationship between gross domestic product growth and residents' dietary nutrition. We employ autoregressive distributed lag models to identify the long-run relationship in the full sample, and then conduct segmented regressions based on major historical phases of China's economic development. Results: In the full sample, economic growth is positively associated with both nutritional quantity and nutritional quality in the long run, but this relationship is not stable over time. Before 1978, the relationship between economic growth and nutritional quantity in China is not significant, whereas after 1978 it becomes significantly positive. The relationship between economic growth and nutritional quality is significantly negative before 1978 and turns significantly positive thereafter. The relationship between economic growth and nutritional outcomes is clearly phase-specific, and its patterns differ between nutritional quantity and nutritional quality. Conclusions: Economic growth does not translate into nutritional improvement in a uniform way. In China, the relationship between economic growth and nutritional outcomes depends on the historical phase and differs between nutritional quantity and nutritional quality. Understanding the nutritional consequences of economic growth requires placing them in the broader context of institutional transformation and the evolution of the food system.

Indexed as

calciumChinadietary nutritioneconomic growthprotein

Identifiers

PMID42370345
PMCPMC13303144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.