Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42370306›Full record

ArticleBJPsych advances2026

Ovarian hormones, hormonal contraceptives and reward processing.

Andrew M Novick, Erin R Weinhold, C Neill Epperson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJPsych advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Andrew M NovickDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Erin R WeinholdDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
C Neill EppersonDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.

Funding

Stress modeling of the human sperm sncRNA transcriptome and causal importance of dynamic miRNA in reproductive and developmental outcomesR01HD105771 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI Tracy L Bale, C. Neill EPPERSON · 2022 to 2026
$3.7M
Neurobiology of hormonal contraceptionK23HD110435 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI Andrew Michael Novick · 2023 to 2026
$643k
NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD110435NICHD NIH HHS L30 HD106379NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD105771
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research on ovarian hormones reveals an increasingly important role in brain function. This includes reward processing, the umbrella phrase for functions that promote motivation for, response to, and learning about rewards. This paper seeks to provide a concise overview of how ovarian hormones influence reward function, with a specific focus surrounding the ovarian hormone derivatives found in hormonal contraception. Despite the complexity of findings, the research suggests a general pattern in which estradiol may promote multiple reward functions and progesterone often appears to play an inhibitory role. Allopregnanolone's effects on reward functions appear to be concentration dependent and follow an inverted-U. Limited research on hormonal contraception suggests that these agents may interfere with reward neurobiology, potentially contributing to deficits in sexual desire and positive mood, though some individuals may be more susceptible than others. Effects of ovarian hormones and their derivatives on reward processing have multiple clinical implications. These are discussed as it relates to hormonal therapy in menopause, avoiding side effects with hormonal contraception, and ongoing research on the use of progesterone in substance use disorders.

Identifiers

PMID42370306
PMCPMC13309219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.