ArticleResearch square2026
Brain MR Elastography Metrics Associated with Alterations in Learning and Memory in People with HIV.
Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
High prevalence of HIV-associated neurocognitive impairment persists despite effective antiretroviral therapy. While conventional neuroimaging often fails to fully explain cognitive deficits in virally suppressed people with HIV (PWH), magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) offers a novel approach to quantify microstructural tissue coherence through brain biomechanics. This study investigated whether MRE-derived biomechanical metrics exhibit a pathological, group-specific relationship with cognitive performance in PWH, and compared their sensitivity against advanced diffusion MRI and peripheral biomarkers of neuronal injury and inflammation. In a cross-sectional cohort of 27 virally suppressed PWH and 30 matched healthy controls, participants underwent comprehensive cognitive testing, multi-frequency MRE (measuring stiffness, viscosity, and strain), multi-shell diffusion MRI (including NODDI metrics), and blood sampling for plasma neurofilament light chain and glial fibrillary acidic protein. PWH exhibited significantly lower cognitive scores than controls, particularly in learning and memory. Although baseline mean values across imaging and peripheral biomarkers did not notably differ between the groups, a significant group-by-cognition interaction emerged exclusively for MRE parameters. Specifically, in PWH, elevated viscosity and reduced strain correlated with poorer attention, whereas lower viscosity and strain correlated with better memory. These biomechanical-behavioral relationships were absent in healthy controls, and no notable interactions were observed for advanced diffusion metrics or blood biomarkers. Ultimately, brain biomechanics measured by MRE demonstrate greater sensitivity to altered cognitive function in PWH than advanced diffusion MRI and peripheral biomarkers, highlighting their potential as functional correlates of neurocognitive impairment that warrant further longitudinal validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.