ArticleResearch square2026
A computational theory of short-term synaptic plasticity: synapses learn to tell time.
Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In computational neuroscience and deep learning models, synapses are viewed as simple computational elements with a single learnable parameter: synaptic strength. Here we propose that synapses are more sophisticated elements with multiple learnable parameters; allowing synapses to tune their short-term synaptic dynamics and optimize the processing of temporal information. We confirm a prediction of this hypothesis by showing that in mouse and human neocortex, synaptic dynamics is not preferentially shaped by the identity of the pre- or postsynaptic neuron. Using computational approaches, we demonstrate that learned synaptic dynamics allows for interval-selectivity and counting at the synaptic level, and significantly enhances the performance of feedforward networks on complex spatiotemporal tasks. Our results provide a framework to understand the mismatch between the computational simplicity of synapses in models and their biochemical complexity, as well as address a fundamental gap between how the brain and artificial neural networks process temporal information.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.