ArticleInfection and drug resistance2026
Real-World Experience with High- versus Low-Dose Polymyxin B for Pulmonary Infections: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Polymyxin B(PMB) is crucial for treating carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pulmonary infections. Despite existing guidelines, real-world dosing varies widely. The clinical and economic outcomes associated with higher versus lower dose regimens in routine practice require further elucidation. Methods: This single-center retrospective cohort study included 235 adult patients with pulmonary infections who received intravenous PMB between January 2020 and December 2024. Based on real-world dosing practices, participants were categorized into high-dose and low-dose groups for comparative analysis of clinical efficacy, safety, and direct medical costs. Results: A statistically significant difference in 28-day and 42-day all-cause mortality was observed between the two groups, although no significant differences were detected in clinical response rates or hospital length of stay. Safety assessments showed no statistically significant differences in hepatotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, or hematologic toxicity between groups; however, most non-significant adverse events occurred more frequently in the high-dose group. Direct medical costs analysis showed that the low-dose regimen significantly reduced drug costs, although total hospitalization costs did not differ significantly between the two groups. Conclusion: For pulmonary infections, low-dose PMB (<1.5 mg/kg/day) combined with extended therapy was associated with lower mortality, better safety, and similar clinical response vs. high dose. Drug costs were lower, suggesting real-world cost savings. These findings support PMB dose optimization, but prospective validation is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.