ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning model for predicting central lymph node metastasis in papillary thyroid cancer.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To develop and validate a machine learning-based prediction model for central lymph node metastasis (CLNM) in papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) patients using routine blood test-derived inflammatory markers and clinical features. Methods: This retrospective study included 1,697 PTC patients. The cohort was randomly divided into training (70%) and validation (30%) sets. Clinical variables and inflammatory markers derived from routine blood tests including neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) were collected. LASSO regression was applied for feature selection, followed by development of eight machine learning algorithms. The optimal model was selected based on discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility. SHAP analysis was performed to enhance interpretability. Results: CLNM occurred in 516 patients (30.4%). LASSO regression identified 29 predictive features. The Stacking Ensemble model achieved superior performance with AUC of 0.988 in training and 0.923 in validation sets, significantly outperforming traditional logistic regression (AUC: 0.721). SHAP analysis revealed maximum tumor size as the most important predictor, followed by LMR, age, VEGF, and SII. Decision curve analysis demonstrated substantial clinical benefit across threshold probabilities. Conclusion: The machine learning-based model incorporating routine blood test-derived inflammatory markers and clinical features demonstrates excellent performance for CLNM prediction in PTC patients, providing a valuable tool for surgical decision-making and precision medicine approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.