ArticleEULAR rheumatology open2026
Efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of proposed biosimilar RGB-19 and tocilizumab intravenously administered to adults with active rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate: a phase 3, randomised study.
Article in EULAR rheumatology open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This phase 3 study (jRCT2031220512) evaluated the equivalence in efficacy, and compared the serum concentration, pharmacodynamics, safety, and immunogenicity of proposed biosimilar RGB-19 and tocilizumab in adults with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods: Participants were randomly assigned 1:1 to intravenous infusions of 8 mg/kg RGB-19 or tocilizumab every 4 weeks, with efficacy evaluated to week 52 and safety follow-up to week 54. The primary endpoint was the mean change from baseline (CfB) in Disease Activity Score based on 28 joints with erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR), with equivalence determined if the 2-sided 95% CI for the pooled difference between groups was within the predefined equivalence margin (±0.6 at week 12). Secondary objectives were other efficacy indicators, serum drug concentration, pharmacodynamics, safety, and immunogenicity. Results: In total, 368 participants were randomly assigned to treatment (RGB-19 N = 182; tocilizumab N = 186). At week 12, the difference in mean DAS28-ESR CfB between groups (RGB-19 n = 173; tocilizumab n = 181) was -0.21 (95% CI: -0.43, 0.02; within the equivalence margin). All other efficacy indicators and serum drug concentration values were similar between groups up to week 52. Median absolute neutrophil count, C-reactive protein, and soluble interleukin-6 receptor values were similar between groups to week 52. Safety profiles were similar, with a similar incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events and adverse drug reactions to week 54. The incidence of treatment-emergent antidrug and neutralising antibodies was similarly low in both groups. Conclusions: This study demonstrated equivalent efficacy, and similar safety and immunogenicity, of RGB-19 and reference tocilizumab for participants with active RA.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.