ArticleEULAR rheumatology open2026
International IVIg prescription patterns in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: real-world insights from the MyoNet survey.
Article in EULAR rheumatology open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) is increasingly used in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs), especially in cases with complex clinical presentations or resistance to conventional immunosuppressants. However, real-world prescription patterns remain poorly defined and are likely influenced by regional, institutional, and economic factors. Methods: A 31-item, English-language e-survey was distributed through the MyoNet registry members after pilot testing and expert review. The survey assessed institutional IVIg treatment practices in IIM, comprising indications, dosing strategies, perceived limitations, and adverse events (AEs). Regional comparisons were performed, and socioeconomic metrics including Human Development Index (HDI) and national gross domestic product (GDP) per capita were correlated with reported barriers. Results: Across 68 centres in 27 countries, IVIg was most frequently used in dermatomyositis (85.3%), immune-mediated necrotising myopathy (82.4%), and antisynthetase syndrome (66.2%). Dysphagia, refractory disease, and rapidly progressive courses were the leading indications. IVIg was predominantly used as second- or third-line treatment and commonly administered alongside glucocorticoids and steroid-sparing immunosuppressants. AEs were frequent (76.5% of centres), most commonly headaches and infusion reactions. Non-European centres more often used IVIg in seropositive patients, interstitial lung disease, and when other immunosuppressants were contraindicated. Access to IVIg significantly correlated with national development and wealth: cost and availability were more restrictive in countries with lower HDI (cost: r = -0.26, Conclusions: This international survey provides a current overview of real-world IVIg use in IIM. Our findings support the need for harmonised treatment guidance to promote equitable access across healthcare systems.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.