ArticleEULAR rheumatology open2026
Professional positioning of general practitioners in the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis in community medicine.
Article in EULAR rheumatology open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Although postmenopausal osteoporosis management has evolved in recent years, it nonetheless remains underdiagnosed and undertreated. Given that general practitioners (GPs) are the keystone of patient screening and referral in France, the present study was conducted to assess their professional positioning in the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Methods: This is a qualitative study based on semidirected interviews, carried out between July 2020 and February 2021. Alsatian GPs were randomly selected and interviewed until data saturation was achieved. The consolidated criteria for qualitative research reporting grid were used, as well as NVivo software to categorise the data. Results: Twenty-three GPs were interviewed. Study participants recognised that the investigation and treatment of osteoporosis begin at a primary care level, typically with the GP. Although some initiated screening by prescribing bone mineral density assessments, only a few prescribed the associated laboratory assessment and spinal X-rays in search of curable osteoarthritis or vertebral fracture. For those GPs who do take the opportunity to initiate treatments for patients, there is an understanding that first-line options often include calcium and vitamin D, at a preventive level. The interviewed physicians interacted mainly with gynaecologists and rheumatologists. Fracture liaison services were widely acclaimed. Several barriers were identified in their care management. The absence of a defined role between specialists and the lack of communication between them were additional highlighted barriers. Conclusions: GPs were unevenly involved in the management of osteoporosis; numerous barriers to care were identified.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.