Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42370066›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2026

A prospective, open-label feasibility study protocol of home-based transcranial direct current stimulation for major depressive disorder in elective lumbar spine surgery candidates.

Arjun K Menta, Samuel P Bronckers, Fernando S Goes, Timothy F Witham, David B Cohen, Amit Jain, Sang H Lee, Lee H Riley, Khaled M Kebaish, Daniel Lubelski and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Arjun K MentaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Samuel P BronckersDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Fernando S GoesDepartment of Psychiatry, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Timothy F WithamDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
David B CohenDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Amit JainDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Sang H LeeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Lee H RileyDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Khaled M KebaishDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Daniel LubelskiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Ali BydonDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Nicholas TheodoreDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Arizona-Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ, United States.
Tej D AzadDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Depression is common among elective lumbar spine surgery candidates and is associated with worse postoperative outcomes. Home-based transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has demonstrated safety and feasibility, with evidence of antidepressant effects in remote randomized and open-label studies of major depressive disorder (MDD). Whether this approach can be feasibly and acceptably implemented as a preoperative intervention in lumbar spine surgical populations is unknown. Methods: We propose a prospective, open-label, single-arm feasibility study evaluating preoperative, home-based tDCS for elective, non-revision lumbar spine surgery candidates with MDD. Adults aged 22-75 years with DSM-5 MDD and at least moderate depressive symptom severity [self-reported Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS-S) ≥ 20] being evaluated for elective lumbar spine surgery will receive home-based tDCS. Key exclusion criteria include history of seizure disorder, implanted cranial electronic or metallic devices, clinically unstable psychiatric conditions, prior brain stimulation therapy, and use of medications that significantly affect cortical excitability. Pre-surgical treatment follows a standardized cadence (5 sessions/week for 3 weeks, then 3 sessions/week) for a minimum of 4 weeks, continuing until surgery or up to 10 weeks. Feasibility will be assessed using a pre-specified tiered exposure framework based on the number of sessions completed before surgery. Anticipated results: Primary outcomes are feasibility and acceptability of preoperative home-based tDCS delivery. The principal exploratory clinical outcome is change in depressive symptom severity measured using MADRS-S. Exploratory perioperative recovery outcomes include spine-related disability, pain intensity, functional status, and opioid utilization. For participants who proceed to surgery, postoperative outcomes will be followed up to 12 months. Discussion: This pilot study will generate feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary signal data to inform the design of future randomized controlled trials of preoperative neuromodulation in surgical populations.

Indexed as

depressionneuromodulationprehabilitationspine surgerytDCS

Identifiers

PMID42370066
PMCPMC13294146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.