Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42370060›Full record

ArticleTrauma surgery & acute care open2025

Usability and feasibility of a mobile application for real-time trauma care guidance: considerations for user adoption.

Brendon Frankel, Len Beasley, Shannon Rosenauer, Chelsea Church, Katheryn Grider, Mark Buchner, Neil Francoeur, Gabriela Zavala Wong, Ashley N Moreno, Lacey LaGrone and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trauma surgery & acute care open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Brendon FrankelUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3206-448X
Len BeasleyAetna Digital, Denver, Colorado, USA.
Shannon RosenauerBoston Consulting Group (BCG), Denver, Colorado, USA.
Chelsea ChurchBoston Consulting Group (BCG), Denver, Colorado, USA.
Katheryn GriderADT, Whitefish, Montana, USA.
Mark BuchnerTactuum, Glasgow, UK.
Neil FrancoeurTactuum, Bellevue, Washington, USA.
Gabriela Zavala WongResearch, Medical Center of the Rockies, Loveland, Colorado, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3337-639X
Ashley N MorenoCoalition for National Trauma Research, San Antonio, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8881-7597
Lacey LaGroneUniversity of Colorado Health, Ft. Collins, Colorado, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4749-969X
2025 Design for Implementation (DFI) Authorship Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Inadequate access to clinical guidance influences the implementation of evidence-based clinical practices in trauma care settings. This guidance is not optimally effective if it cannot be disseminated in settings where it is most needed, leading to substantial inequities in trauma care. To address this problem, this project developed a trauma clinical guidance repository and accompanying mobile application and sought to elicit concept feedback. Methods: As part of year 2 of the Results: 56 post-conference survey responses were collected. Respondents provided detailed, indepth feedback on the display and user features of the mobile application and gave input on what factors they would prioritize to maximize the tool's adoption, with the most frequent mentions being about logical and user-friendly application clickthrough. Areas of positive feedback included the repository's novel contribution as a clinical tool and its potential to aid clinicians in resource-constrained settings. Components of the tool that participants believed required further iteration included ensuring clear, concise language and making it more user-friendly to retrieve information during emergent situations efficiently. A prominent theme throughout the sessions and survey is the necessity of continuous opportunities for feedback from a wide range of stakeholders, both clinical and non-clinical. Discussion: For novel information dissemination platforms to be effective, clinical guidance must be continuously updated and presented in a user-friendly, logical format that allows clinicians to find and integrate information into practice seamlessly. Conceptual feedback will contribute to a better understanding of clinician needs, further elucidating the opportunities to match technology with bedside utility.Level of Evidence: Level VI.

Indexed as

guideline

Identifiers

PMID42370060
PMCPMC13296019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.