ArticleAnnals of burns and fire disasters2026
Isolated Deep Thermal Burns of the Dorsal Foot Treated by Excision and Split-Thickness Skin Grafting at the Burn Centre of Lille: Characteristics, Surgical Management and Healing Delay.
Article in Annals of burns and fire disasters, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Foot burns involve a small total body surface area but may cause significant functional impairment. Deep thermal foot burns often require surgical excision and split-thickness skin grafting, yet the optimal timing of grafting remains debated. Our objective is to describe patient characteristics, surgical management and healing outcomes of isolated deep thermal dorsal foot burns treated at a single burn centre. We conducted a retrospective cohort study including all patients surgically treated for partial- or full-thickness dorsal thermal foot burns at the Burn Centre of the University Hospital of Lille between 2021 and 2023. Two surgical strategies were used: excision followed by delayed grafting and single-stage excision with immediate grafting. Healing times were analyzed per burned foot. Sixty-three patients (75 feet) were included. Patients treated with delayed grafting were older and more frequently had bilateral foot burns. Burn severity was comparable between groups. Post-operative healing time was significantly shorter after single-stage excision and grafting, whereas total healing time from burn injury did not differ significantly. Dermal matrix use was not associated with differences in healing time. In this real-life retrospective cohort, single-stage excision and immediate grafting were associated with faster post-operative healing, while overall healing time remained similar between surgical strategies. Differences between groups reflect clinical decision-making based on patient and wound characteristics rather than a protocol-driven approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42370054PMC13296917What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.