Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42370046›Full record

ArticleAnnals of burns and fire disasters2026

Burn Unit Operational System: Systematic Review and Lessons Learned for Practical Implications in Indonesia.

C Menna, M H Syarief, R K Hartono

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of burns and fire disasters, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

C MennaPublic Health Study Program, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universitas Indonesia Maju, Jakarta, Indonesia.
M H SyariefPublic Health Study Program, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universitas Indonesia Maju, Jakarta, Indonesia.
R K HartonoPublic Health Study Program, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universitas Indonesia Maju, Jakarta, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Indonesia, a country with a high incidence and burden of burn injuries, still faces limited numbers and uneven distribution of burn units, as well as the absence of operational guidelines. This review analyzes global burn unit operational systems to identify best practices that can be adapted for the development and optimization of burn units in Indonesia. A systematic search was conducted in electronic databases, including PubMed, Science Direct, Sage Journals, and MEDLINE. Inclusion criteria comprised studies focusing on managerial aspects of burn units. Literature search was done according to PRISMA guidelines, and included studies were critically appraised. Following screening and eligibility assessment of 1,046 studies, 20 studies were included in the review. A total of 6 guidelines provided recommendations for burn unit operational systems, and 13 studies offered recommendations for developing burn unit operational systems that could be implemented in Indonesia. Indonesia can adopt approaches from international guidelines to establish more burn units in priority areas based on needs, with operational design guidelines aligned with global standards to enhance the quality of care nationwide. Analysis of global burn unit operational systems successfully identified guidelines and recommendations for the development and management of burn units in Indonesia.

Indexed as

burn unitIndonesiaoperational system

Identifiers

PMID42370046
PMCPMC13296970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.