ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2026
Clinical Practice of the Proactive Health Concept in Chronic Disease Management: A Qualitative Study from the Perspective of Neurology Medical Staff.
Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This qualitative study explores the understanding and clinical practice of the proactive health concept among neurology medical staff in managing chronic neurological disorders. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 15 healthcare professionals from a tertiary hospital in China, and data were analyzed using Colaizzi's seven-step phenomenological method. Results: Five core themes emerged: (1) education and motivation as core strategies for promoting proactive health; (2) multidimensional factors influencing patient compliance, including cognition, emotion, and family support; (3) the dual role of medical tools and technologies in facilitating and hindering self-management; (4) the nascent state and mixed impact of external support systems such as patient groups and community services; and (5) systemic barriers including time constraints and lack of institutional support. Findings indicate that while medical staff recognize the value of proactive health, its implementation is hindered by individual patient differences, limited clinical resources, and underdeveloped external systems. Conclusion: The study highlights the need for a multi-level support environment involving institutional, policy, societal, and technological dimensions to enable the effective integration of proactive health into chronic disease management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.