ArticleDigital health
Explainable residual ensemble modelling for EuroQol-5 dimensions-based quality-of-life assessment and stratification in patients with knee osteoarthritis.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To develop an interpretable machine-learning framework for supporting quality-of-life (QoL) assessment and stratification in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) by integrating linear and nonlinear modelling strategies. Methods: This retrospective study utilised de-identified clinical data from 1,102 patients with knee OA collected at a university hospital in South Korea between September 2013 and January 2022 and made available via the AI Hub platform. QoL was assessed using the EuroQol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) index and dichotomised at 0.7. A residual ensemble model combining logistic regression (LR) and a Random Forest residual learner was developed and evaluated using stratified train-test split and three-fold cross-validation. Model performance was assessed using accuracy, F Results: The proposed model achieved superior performance on the independent test set (accuracy = 0.88, precision = 0.85, recall = 0.83, F Conclusions: The proposed residual ensemble framework effectively balances predictive performance and interpretability, providing a clinically meaningful framework for QoL assessment and risk stratification in knee OA. This approach supports the development of explainable decision-support tools in digital musculoskeletal health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.