Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42370005›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Implementing artificial intelligence (AI)-supported communication tools in healthcare: System-level perspectives.

Carmen M Diaz, Kelly L Reed, Laura E Barnes, Tabor Flickinger, Trish Truong, Zhiyuan Wang, Virginia LeBaron

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Carmen M DiazUniversity of Virginia School of Nursing, Charlottesville, VA, US.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-6994-4515
Kelly L ReedUniversity of Virginia School of Nursing, Charlottesville, VA, US.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-6411-8273
Laura E BarnesUniversity of Virginia School of Engineering & Applied Science, Charlottesville, VA, US.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8224-5164
Tabor FlickingerUniversity of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, US.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8820-2536
Trish TruongUniversity of Virginia School of Nursing, Charlottesville, VA, US.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-8706-4227
Zhiyuan WangUniversity of Virginia School of Engineering & Applied Science, Charlottesville, VA, US.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1611-2053
Virginia LeBaronUniversity of Virginia School of Nursing, Charlottesville, VA, US.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1299-4730

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Quality patient-clinician communication is critical to ensure optimal patient outcomes. Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have increased the potential to develop technologies to evaluate and support patient-clinician communication. One example is CommSense, an AI-supported communication technology designed by our team to record and analyze clinical conversations and provide clinicians with actionable, tailored feedback to enhance communication performance. Objective: To explore system-level considerations to successfully implement communication technologies into healthcare contexts, using CommSense as an example case. Methods: This descriptive qualitative study used a purposive sampling strategy to recruit participants with communication expertise across four categories: administrators; industry; policymakers; and scientists. Semi-structured interviews focused on: 1) general barriers to patient-clinician communication; and 2) implementation considerations for integrating communication technologies into healthcare systems. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, verified, and then analyzed using a combination of inductive and deductive coding strategies to identify broader patterns and themes. Results: Participants (n=13) discussed general barriers to quality communication between patients and clinicians, including: inadequate clinician communication training; generalized versus tailored patient communication; and hesitancy to initiate conversations with patients regarding difficult or sensitive issues, such as advance care planning. System-level implementation considerations focused on: the importance of integrating AI-supported communication technologies within existing health system infrastructure, clinical workflows, and policies and procedures; engagement of champions throughout the implementation process; and intentionality with the design and delivery of communication performance feedback. Participants also emphasized the particular benefit of communication technologies to support trainees and their learning. Conclusion: AI-supported communication technologies have the potential to address persistent barriers to quality communication within healthcare. Our findings demonstrate the importance of including decision-makers and outside experts across multiple domains to ensure successful implementation of AI-supported communication tools within complex healthcare systems.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecommunicationhealthcareimplementationlarge language modelsnatural language processingpalliative carepatient-clinician communicationstakeholder engagementwearables

Identifiers

PMID42370005
PMCPMC13309646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.