ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2026
Comparison of costotransverse block and erector spinae plane block for perioperative analgesia in patients scheduled for modified radical mastectomy - A pilot study.
Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Fascial plane blocks have emerged as a promising element for multimodal analgesia in breast surgeries. This study aimed to compare intra-operative and post-operative opioid requirements following costotransverse block (CTB) and erector spinae plane block (ESPB) for perioperative analgesia in patients scheduled for modified radical mastectomy (MRM). Methods: Sixty patients aged 25 to 65 years scheduled for MRM were randomised to receive either CTB or ESPB with 25 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine. The primary outcome was to compare the effectiveness of these two blocks in reducing the consumption of opioids for post-operative pain relief, measured by 24-hour morphine requirement. Secondary outcomes included time required to perform the block, intra-operative haemodynamics, total intra-operative fentanyl requirement, post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and any complications related to the blocks. Results: The numeric rating scale scores were comparable between the groups at all time points during the 24-hour post-operative period. The rescue analgesic requirement (morphine), median (interquartile range) was similar in the CTB group (3 [3, 3] mg) and in the ESPB group (3 [3, 3.75] mg) ( Conclusion: Both CTB and ESPB are comparable in providing post-operative analgesia for MRM patients. However, CTB likely offers better intra-operative analgesia as observed by the lower intra-operative opioid requirement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.