Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42369971›Full record

Trial reportOpen forum infectious diseases2026

Cryptococcal Meningitis: Comparison of Short- (≤ 1 Week) Versus Longer-duration (> 1 Week) Liposomal Amphotericin B Induction Therapy and Factors Associated With Clinical Outcomes in HIV and Non-HIV Patients.

Sun O Park, Matthew A Stack, Ty C Drake, Rodrigo Hasbun, Luis Ostrosky-Zeichner

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Open forum infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sun O ParkDivision of Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5746-395X
Matthew A StackDivision of Infectious Diseases, Allergy, and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St.Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-5585-1675
Ty C DrakeMemorial Hermann Hospital-Texas Medical Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-7789-3681
Rodrigo HasbunDivision of Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4155-7089
Luis Ostrosky-ZeichnerDivision of Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4784-7589

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Shorter induction regimens for cryptococcal meningitis (CM) are being proposed, but data from resource-rich countries are limited. We compared clinical outcomes between short- (≤ 1 week) and longer-duration (> 1 week) of liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB) induction therapy and investigated factors associated with clinical outcomes at a United States medical center. Methods: In this retrospective study, cases of CM were identified by a positive cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) culture for Results: Of 129 patients, 20 were in the short-duration (11 patients with HIV) and 109 in the longer-duration L-AmB group (72 with HIV). The short-duration group was less severely ill at baseline. Unfavorable GOS at discharge was 50.0% versus 61.5% ( Conclusions: Short-duration L-AmB may have comparable outcomes to longer-duration in this cohort; further studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Indexed as

cryptococcal meningitiscryptococcosisGlasgow Outcome Scaleliposomal amphotericin B

Identifiers

PMID42369971
PMCPMC13308711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.