ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2026
Individualized Therapy Guided by Drug Susceptibility Testing for Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis.
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Drug-resistant tuberculosis remains a major health challenge, with treatment success for multidrug- or rifampicin-resistant (MDR/RR) disease substantially lower than for drug-susceptible tuberculosis. Access to accurate and timely drug susceptibility testing (DST) is essential for designing effective treatment regimens. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adults with pulmonary tuberculosis treated at the Research Center Borstel in Germany between March 2019 and November 2021. Patients with culture-confirmed tuberculosis and either fully drug-susceptible disease or phenotypically confirmed MDR/RR tuberculosis were included. Comprehensive phenotypic DST (pDST) and molecular DST (mDST) by whole-genome sequencing (WGS) were performed. Treatment outcomes were assessed using the WHO 2021 definitions as the primary endpoint, with TBnet outcome definitions evaluated secondarily. Firth's penalized logistic regression identified predictors of cure. Results: Sixty-six patients were included: 43 with drug-susceptible tuberculosis and 23 with MDR/RR tuberculosis. Concordance between pDST and WGS-based mDST was high. In drug-susceptible disease, 13 (30%) were cured and 28 (65%) completed treatment, resulting in a WHO-defined success rate of 95%; 33 (77%) met TBnet cure criteria. Among MDR/RR patients, four (17%) were cured and 16 (70%) completed treatment, yielding a WHO-defined success rate of 87%; 19 (83%) were cured per TBnet criteria. No significant predictors of cure were identified. Conclusions: In this high-resource setting with access to comprehensive pDST and mDST, patients with MDR/RR tuberculosis achieved outcomes comparable to those with drug-susceptible disease. High concordance between phenotypic and molecular DST supports the reliability of mDST for guiding individualized treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.