ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2026
Efficacy of a Brief Educational Video for Patients Prescribed Latent Tuberculosis Treatment: A Randomized Trial in the United States.
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Treatment for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) is important for preventing tuberculosis disease, but many patients with LTBI do not complete treatment. Patients report barriers to treatment including poor knowledge of LTBI and insufficient treatment support. Methods: We conducted a randomized trial of a 3-minute educational video for patients prescribed LTBI treatment. Adults at Kaiser Permanente Southern California prescribed LTBI treatment were randomized to receive messages with the video link (intervention) or no intervention (control). Patients were followed for up to 12 months to assess treatment initiation and completion. We also conducted a brief survey among patients who watched the video and convened a focus group among those who did not. Results: During 06/2022-12/2023, we enrolled 496 patients in the control group and 1398 patients in the intervention group, of whom 17.0% watched the video. Patient characteristics were balanced between groups. Most were prescribed rifampin (64.8%) and isoniazid (23.4%). In intention-to-treat analyses, 82.9% and 78.8% of patients in control and intervention groups, respectively, initiated treatment (relative risk (RR) 0.95 [95% confidence interval: 0.90-1.00]) and 41.5% and 40.1% completed treatment (RR 0.97 [0.85-1.09]). In per-protocol analyses, 83.1% and 86.5% initiated treatment (aRR 1.03 [0.96-1.11]) and 41.4% and 45.1% completed treatment (aRR 1.06 [0.88-1.27]). Patients reported high acceptability and few challenges watching the video. Message fatigue and nonspecific messages were reasons for not watching the video. Conclusions: The LTBI video intervention was not associated with increased treatment initiation and completion in this study. Additional interventions are needed to improve patient knowledge and support LTBI treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.