Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42369917›Full record

ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences2026

From Real-World Research to Real-World Decisions: Insights from ICHR-26 at Rehman Medical Institute Peshawar.

Seelay Srak Rehman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Seelay Srak RehmanSeelay Srak Rehman, Director RCN, Rehman College of Nursing, Hayatabad, Peshawar.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fourth International Conference on Health Research (ICHR-26), hosted by Rehman Medical Institute (RMI), brought into focus an important challenge within the current health research landscape, namely the growing disconnect between research production and its practical applicability in real-world decision-making. The conference emphasized that the problem is not a lack of research, but the large volume of studies that fail to guide practice, education, and policy due to limited contextual relevance and weak translation into action. The conference also highlighted key factors to help bridge this gap, including stronger academic platforms for sharing knowledge, and the contribution of practice-based disciplines, particularly nursing, in linking research to real healthcare settings. It also proposed a practical framework to strengthen the link between research and its real-world use, built on three key pillars: contextual relevance, strategic dissemination, and translation into practice. Together, these elements support the production of research that is scientifically sound, meaningful to local healthcare needs, and capable of informing clinical and policy decisions. In doing so, the conference reinforced RMI's vision of promoting impact.

Indexed as

conference disseminationICHR-26institutional visibilityreal-world decision-makingresearch cultureTranslational research

Identifiers

PMID42369917
PMCPMC13309882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.